Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26755583›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Testing the kinship theory of intragenomic conflict in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

David A Galbraith, Sarah D Kocher, Tom Glenn, Istvan Albert, Greg J Hunt, Joan E Strassmann, David C Queller, Christina M Grozinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
31.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Honey bee queen pheromone provides an early warning system to prevent collapsing colonies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. How does epigenetics influence the course of evolution?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Parent-of-origin effects, allele-specific expression, genomic imprinting and paternal manipulation in social insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David A GalbraithDepartment of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; dag5031@gmail.com cmg25@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0051-2439
Sarah D KocherDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544;
Tom GlennGlenn Apiaries, Fallbrook, CA 92088;
Istvan AlbertDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
Greg J HuntDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907;
Joan E StrassmannDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-8440
David C QuellerDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Christina M GrozingerDepartment of Entomology, Center for Pollinator Research, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; dag5031@gmail.com cmg25@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USWashington University in St. Louis · USHarvard University · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual reproduction brings genes from two parents (matrigenes and patrigenes) together into one individual. These genes, despite being unrelated, should show nearly perfect cooperation because each gains equally through the production of offspring. However, an individual's matrigenes and patrigenes can have different probabilities of being present in other relatives, so kin selection could act on them differently. Such intragenomic conflict could be implemented by partial or complete silencing (imprinting) of an allele by one of the parents. Evidence supporting this theory is seen in offspring-mother interactions, with patrigenes favoring acquisition of more of the mother's resources if some of the costs fall on half-siblings who do not share the patrigene. The kinship theory of intragenomic conflict is little tested in other contexts, but it predicts that matrigene-patrigene conflict may be rife in social insects. We tested the hypothesis that honey bee worker reproduction is promoted more by patrigenes than matrigenes by comparing across nine reciprocal crosses of two distinct genetic stocks. As predicted, hybrid workers show reproductive trait characteristics of their paternal stock, (indicating enhanced activity of the patrigenes on these traits), greater patrigenic than matrigenic expression, and significantly increased patrigenic-biased expression in reproductive workers. These results support both the general prediction that matrigene-patrigene conflict occurs in social insects and the specific prediction that honey bee worker reproduction is driven more by patrigenes. The success of these predictions suggests that intragenomic conflict may occur in many contexts where matrigenes and patrigenes have different relatednesses to affected kin.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesCrosses, GeneticDNA MethylationFamilyFemaleMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproductionevolutionary biologyintragenomic conflictkinship theorysocial insectssociogenomics

Identifiers

PMID26755583
PMCPMC4743802
OpenAlexW2234230861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.