Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26755570›Full record

ArticleJournal of learning disabilities

Developmental Delays in Executive Function from 3 to 5 Years of Age Predict Kindergarten Academic Readiness.

Michael T Willoughby, Brooke Magnus, Lynne Vernon-Feagans, Clancy B Blair, Family Life Project Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of learning disabilities. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A short executive functioning questionnaire in the context of early childhood screening: psychometric properties.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael T Willoughby1 RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Brooke Magnus2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Lynne Vernon-Feagans2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Clancy B Blair3 New York University, USA.
Family Life Project Investigators

Funding

Temperment, Psychobiological, and Cognitive PredictorsP01HD039667 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BURCHINAL, MARGARET RUTH · 2002 to 2011
$29.1M
Stress, Self-Regulation and Psychopathology in Middle ChildhoodR01HD081252 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BLAIR, CLANCY B · 2015 to 2019
$6.5M
MEASUREMENT OF EXECUTIVE FUNCTION IN YOUNG CHILDRENR01HD051502 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI BLAIR, CLANCY B · 2005 to 2009
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD039667NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD051502NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial evidence has established that individual differences in executive function (EF) in early childhood are uniquely predictive of children's academic readiness at school entry. The current study tested whether growth trajectories of EF across the early childhood period could be used to identify a subset of children who were at pronounced risk for academic impairment in kindergarten. Using data that were collected at the age 3, 4, and 5 home assessments in the Family Life Project ( N = 1,120), growth mixture models were used to identify 9% of children who exhibited impaired EF performance (i.e., persistently low levels of EF that did not show expected improvements across time). Compared to children who exhibited typical trajectories of EF, the delayed group exhibited substantial impairments in multiple indicators of academic readiness in kindergarten (Cohen's ds = 0.9-2.7; odds ratios = 9.8-23.8). Although reduced in magnitude following control for a range of socioeconomic and cognitive (general intelligence screener, receptive vocabulary) covariates, moderate-sized group differences remained (Cohen's ds = 0.2-2.4; odds ratios = 3.9-5.4). Results are discussed with respect to the use of repeated measures of EF as a method of early identification, as well as the resulting translational implications of doing so.

Indexed as

Academic PerformanceSchoolsChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleacademic achievementdevelopmental disabilityexecutive functionschool readiness

Identifiers

PMID26755570
PMCPMC5266699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.