Potential Simpson's Paradox in Multicenter Study of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Suicide mortality rates in Japan before and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic era.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024
   Review
2. Clinical Phenotyping with an Outcomes-driven Mixture of Experts for Patient Matching and Risk Estimation.ACM transactions on computing for healthcare · 2023
   Article
3. Adversarially-Regularized Mixed Effects Deep Learning (ARMED) Models Improve Interpretability, Performance, and Generalization on Clustered (non-iid) Data.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2023
   Article
4. Eye of the beholder: Risk calculators and barriers to adoption in surgical trainees.Surgery · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Reply to G.B. Holt.2016
• Comment on
  Use and Effectiveness of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.2015

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as