Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26755057›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016

Mobility and stress analysis of different surgical simulations during a sacral colpopexy, using a finite element model of the pelvic system.

Estelle Jeanditgautier, Olivier Mayeur, Mathias Brieu, Gery Lamblin, Chrystele Rubod, Michel Cosson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04551859 (Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04551859 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Concordance of Pelvic Organ Mobility Measurements Between the Finite Element Model and the Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Patients Undergoing a Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconRan2020 to 2021Enrolled41ConditionsSacrospinofixation, Apical ProlapseArmsDynamic Pelvic Floor MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Female pelvic floor biomechanics: bridging the gap.Current opinion in urology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Estelle JeanditgautierHopital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, University Lille-Nord de France, 1 rue Eugène Avinée, 59037, Lille Cedex, France. estelle.jdg@gmail.com.
Olivier MayeurLaboratoire Mécanique de Lille, UMR CNRS 8107, Ecole Centrale de Lille, 59651, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Mathias BrieuLaboratoire Mécanique de Lille, UMR CNRS 8107, Ecole Centrale de Lille, 59651, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France.
Gery LamblinHopital Mere-enfant, CHRU Lyon, Lyon, France.
Chrystele RubodHopital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, University Lille-Nord de France, 1 rue Eugène Avinée, 59037, Lille Cedex, France.
Michel CossonHopital Jeanne de Flandre, CHRU de Lille, University Lille-Nord de France, 1 rue Eugène Avinée, 59037, Lille Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisWe aim to analyze the combined influence of the size of the mesh, the number of sutures, the combined use of an anterior and posterior mesh, and the tension applied to the promontory, on the mobility of the pelvic organs and on the sutures, using a Finite Element (FE) model of the female pelvic system during abdominal sacral colpopexy.

methodsWe used a FE model of the female pelvic system, which allowed us to simulate the mobility of the pelvic system and to evaluate problems related to female prolapse. The meshes were added to the geometrical model and then transferred to computing software. This analysis allowed us to compare the stress and mobility during a thrust effort in different situations.

resultsThe bigger the mesh, the less mobility of both anterior and posterior organs there would be. This is accompanied by an increase in stress at the suture level. The combination of a posterior mesh with an anterior one decreases mobility and stress at the suture level. There is a particularly relevant stressing zone on the suture at the cervix. The increase in the number of sutures induces a decrease in the tension applied at each suture zone and has no impact on organ mobility.

conclusionOur model enables us to simulate and analyze an infinite number of surgical hypotheses. Even if these results are not validated at a clinical level, we can observe the importance of the association of both an anterior and a posterior mesh or the number of sutures.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisGynecologic Surgical ProceduresModels, BiologicalComputer SimulationFemaleHumansPelvisSurgical MeshSuturesFinite element modelSacral colpopexy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.