Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26754924›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2016

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Africa and a Comparison of Individual Case Safety Report Characteristics Between Africa and the Rest of the World: Analyses of Spontaneous Reports in VigiBase®.

Haggar H Ampadu, Jarno Hoekman, Marieke L de Bruin, Shanthi N Pal, Sten Olsson, Daniele Sartori, Hubert G M Leufkens, Alexander N O Dodoo

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: potential facilitators perceived by community pharmacists in Egypt - a cross-sectional study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025
    Article
  20. Research ethics · 2025
    Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Haggar H AmpaduWHO Collaborating Centre for Advocacy and Training in Pharmacovigilance, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Ghana, P.O Box GP 4236, Accra, Ghana. haggar.ampadu@who-pvafrica.org.
Jarno HoekmanUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marieke L de BruinUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Shanthi N PalSafety and Vigilance, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sten OlssonUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Daniele SartoriUppsala Monitoring Centre, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hubert G M LeufkensUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexander N O DodooWHO Collaborating Centre for Advocacy and Training in Pharmacovigilance, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Ghana, P.O Box GP 4236, Accra, Ghana.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity of Ghana · GHUppsala Monitoring Centre · SEWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFollowing the start of the World Health Organization (WHO) Programme for International Drug Monitoring (PIDM) by 10 member countries in 1968, it took another 24 years for the first two African countries to join in 1992, by which time the number of member countries in the PIDM had grown to 33. Whilst pharmacovigilance (PV), including the submission of individual case safety reports (ICSR) to VigiBase(®), the WHO global ICSR database, is growing in Africa, no data have been published on the growth of ICSR reporting from Africa and how the features of ICSRs from Africa compare with the rest of the world (RoW).

objectiveThe objective of this paper was to provide an overview of the growth of national PV centres in Africa, the reporting of ICSRs by African countries, and the features of ICSRs from Africa, and to compare ICSRs from Africa with the RoW.

methodsThe search and analysis interface of VigiBase(®)--VigiLyze(®)--was used to characterise ICSRs submitted by African countries and the RoW. The distribution of ICSRs by African countries was listed and characterised by anatomic therapeutic chemical (ATC) code, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA(®)) system organ class (SOC) classification, and patient age and sex. The case-defining features of ICSRs between Africa and the RoW were also compared.

resultsThe number of African countries in the PIDM increased from 2 in 1992 to 35 at the end of September 2015, and African PIDM members have cumulatively submitted 103,499 ICSRs (0.88 % of global ICSRs) to VigiBase(®). The main class of products in African ICSRs are nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (14.04 %), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (9.09 %), antivirals for the treatment of HIV infections (5.50 %), combinations of sulfonamides and trimethoprim (2.98 %) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (2.42 %). The main product classes implicated in ICSRs from the RoW are tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) inhibitors (5.29 %), topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory preparations (2.26 %), selective immunosuppressants (2.08 %), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (2.04 %) and HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (1.85 %). The main SOCs reported from Africa versus the RoW include skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (31.14 % vs. 19.58 %), general disorders and administration site conditions (20.91 % vs. 30.49 %) and nervous system disorders (17.48 % vs. 19.13 %). The 18-44 years age group dominated ICSRs from Africa, while the 45-64 years age group dominated the RoW. Identical proportions of females (57 % Africa and the RoW) and males (37 % Africa and the RoW) were represented.

conclusionsAs at the end of September 2015, 35 of 54 African countries were Full Member countries of the PIDM. Although the number of ICSRs from Africa has increased substantially, ICSRs from Africa still make up <1 % of the global total in VigiBase(®). The features of ICSRs from Africa differ to those from the RoW in relation to the classes of products as well as age group of patients affected. The gender of patients represented in these ICSRs are identical.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, PharmaceuticalAdolescentAdultAfricaAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacovigilanceReverse Transcriptase InhibitorsYoung AdultAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnti-HIV AgentsReverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26754924
PMCPMC4796322
OpenAlexW2235493209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.