Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26754836›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Case-control study of pathogens involved in piglet diarrhea.

Vera L A Ruiz, Josete G Bersano, Aline F Carvalho, Márcia H B Catroxo, Daniela P Chiebao, Fábio Gregori, Simone Miyashiro, Alessandra F C Nassar, Trícia M F S Oliveira, Renato A Ogata and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antimicrobial activity ofJournal of animal science and technology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Detection of EnterotoxigenicLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vera L A RuizFaculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. letticie@usp.br.
Josete G BersanoBiological Institute, São Paulo Agency for Agribusiness Technology, Secretary of Agriculture and Food Supply, São Paulo, Brazil. bersano@biologico.sp.gov.br.
Aline F CarvalhoBacteriology Laboratory, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil. linebio@gmail.com.
Márcia H B CatroxoBiological Institute, São Paulo Agency for Agribusiness Technology, Secretary of Agriculture and Food Supply, São Paulo, Brazil. catroxo@biologico.sp.gov.br.
Daniela P ChiebaoSão Paulo Agency for Agribusiness Technology, Secretary of Agriculture and Food Supply, São Paulo, Brazil. danichiebao@apta.sp.gov.br.
Fábio GregoriSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. acme@usp.br.
Simone MiyashiroBiological Institute, São Paulo Agency for Agribusiness Technology, Secretary of Agriculture and Food Supply, São Paulo, Brazil. miyashiro@biologico.sp.gov.br.
Alessandra F C NassarBiological Institute, São Paulo Agency for Agribusiness Technology, Secretary of Agriculture and Food Supply, São Paulo, Brazil. nassar@biologico.sp.gov.br.
Trícia M F S OliveiraFaculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. tricia@usp.br.
Renato A OgataBiological Institute, São Paulo Agency for Agribusiness Technology, Secretary of Agriculture and Food Supply, São Paulo, Brazil. renato@biologico.sp.gov.br.
Eliana P ScarcelliBiological Institute, São Paulo Agency for Agribusiness Technology, Secretary of Agriculture and Food Supply, São Paulo, Brazil. pinheiro@biologico.sp.gov.br.
Paloma O ToniettiSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. palomatonietti@gmail.com.
Instituto Biológico · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRAgência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios · BRInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiarrhea in piglets directly affects commercial swine production. The disease results from the interaction of pathogens with the host immune system and is also affected by management procedures. Several pathogenic agents such as Campylobacter spp., Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., group A rotavirus (RV-A), coronaviruses (transmissible gastroenteritis virus; porcine epidemic diarrhea virus), as well as nematode and protozoan parasites, can be associated with disease cases.

resultsAll bacterial, viral, protozoan, and parasitic agents here investigated, with the exception of Salmonella spp. as well as both coronaviruses, were detected in varying proportions in piglet fecal samples, and positive animals were equally distributed between case and control groups. A statistically significant difference between case and control groups was found only for Cystoisospora suis (p = 0.034) and Eimeria spp. (p = 0.047). When co-infections were evaluated, a statistically significant difference was found only for C. perfringens β2 and C. suis (p = 0.014).

conclusionsThe presence of pathogens in piglets alone does not determine the occurrence of diarrhea episodes. Thus, the indiscriminate use of antibiotic and anthelminthic medication should be re-evaluated. This study also reinforces the importance of laboratory diagnosis and correct interpretation of results as well as the relevance of control and prophylactic measures.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsCase-Control StudiesCoccidiosisCoinfectionCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsDiarrheaEimeriaFecesIsosporaIsosporiasisRotavirusRotavirus Infections

Identifiers

PMID26754836
PMCPMC4710041
OpenAlexW2277158564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.