Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26754471›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2016

Pain assessment according to the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain classification in patients with spinal cord injury referred to a multidisciplinary pain center.

S Mahnig, G Landmann, L Stockinger, E Opsommer

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05098587 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Are Changes in Pain Perception Associated With Changes in Brain Activity Patterns in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury and Neuropathic Pain After a Virtual Walking Training Program - A Pilot Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSwiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRan2021 to 2023Enrolled12ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Neuropathic Pain
NCT07165353 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Walking With Habitual Feedback to Reduce Chronic Neuropathic Pain in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorSwiss Paraplegic Research, NottwilRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI), Neuropathic Pain Due to Spinal Cord InjuryArmsVirtual Walking, Sham Virtual Walking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Quality of in-hospital care in traumatic spinal column and cord injuries (TSC/SCI) in I.R Iran.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. [Pain in patients with paraplegia].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S MahnigUniversity of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Lausanne, Switzerland.
G LandmannCentre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-2820
L StockingerCentre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland.
E OpsommerUniversity of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO), Lausanne, Switzerland.
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland · CHSwiss Paraplegic Center · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designThis is a retrospective study.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of pain types in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) according to the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain (ISCIP) classification.

settingThis study was conducted in a multidisciplinary pain center.

methodsSocio-demographic and clinical data were examined and ISCIP classification was applied.

resultsSixty-six individuals (51±13 years) with SCI had pain, a lesion older than 5 years in 67% and a pain history older than 5 years in 54% of patients. According to the ISCIP classification, nociceptive pain was present in 58% (musculoskeletal pain) and 3% (visceral pain) of the patients. At-level, below-level neuropathic pain and other neuropathic pain were observed, respectively in 53, 42 and 5% of patients. Unknown pain type was found in 8% of patients. Patients with complete lesions showed significantly more frequent neuropathic pain (P=0.021) and more frequent at-level SCI pain (P=0.00) compared with those with incomplete lesions. Patients with paraplegia had more often at-level pain (P=0.00), whereas patients with tetraplegia reported more often below-level pain (P=0.00). Patients had severe pain (mean intensity: 8.2 (±1.6) on a 0 to 10 numerical scale) and showed high grades of pain chronicity. Mild to severe depression and anxiety were present, respectively in 53 and 56% of patients. The health-related quality of life was low.

conclusionThe use of the ISCIP classification in a clinical setting is mirroring the very complex pain situation in patients with SCI referred to a multidisciplinary pain center, and it might be an important step for adequate pain therapy.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain ClinicsRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexSpinal Cord InjuriesStatistics, NonparametricYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26754471
OpenAlexW2235910276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.