Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26754174›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Qualitative study of barriers to cervical cancer screening among Nigerian women.

Fatima Isa Modibbo, Eileen Dareng, Patience Bamisaye, Elima Jedy-Agba, Ayodele Adewole, Lawal Oyeneyin, Olayinka Olaniyan, Clement Adebamowo

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fatima Isa ModibboDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, National Hospital Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Eileen DarengDepartment of Research, Institute of Human Virology, Abuja, Nigeria Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Patience BamisayeDepartment of Nursing Services, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Elima Jedy-AgbaDepartment of Research, Institute of Human Virology, Abuja, Nigeria Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ayodele AdewoleMother and Child Hospital, Ondo, Nigeria.
Lawal OyeneyinMother and Child Hospital, Ondo, Nigeria.
Olayinka OlaniyanDepartment of Research, Institute of Human Virology, Abuja, Nigeria Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Clement AdebamowoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Institute of Human Virology and Greenebaum Cancer Centre, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Institute of Human Virology · NGNational Hospital Abuja · NGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

African Collaborative Center for Microbiome and Genomics Research (ACCME)U54HG006947 · NHGRI · INSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY · PI ADEBAMOWO, CLEMENT ADEBAYO · 2013 to 2018
$5.7M
Capacity Development for Research into AIDS Associated malignancies (CADRE)D43CA153792 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ADEBAMOWO, CLEMENT ADEBAYO · 2010 to 2013
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS D43 CA153792NCI NIH HHS NCI/NIH 1D43 CA153792NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG006947PHS HHS NIH/NHGRI U54 HG006947
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the barriers to cervical cancer screening, focusing on religious and cultural factors, in order to inform group-specific interventions that may improve uptake of cervical cancer screening programmes.

designWe conducted four focus group discussions among Muslim and Christian women in Nigeria.

settingDiscussions were conducted in two hospitals, one in the South West and the other in the North Central region of Nigeria.

participants27 Christian and 22 Muslim women over the age of 18, with no diagnosis of cancer.

resultsMost participants in the focus group discussions had heard about cervical cancer except Muslim women in the South Western region who had never heard about cervical cancer. Participants believed that wizardry, multiple sexual partners and inserting herbs into the vagina cause cervical cancer. Only one participant knew about the human papillomavirus. Among the Christian women, the majority of respondents had heard about cervical cancer screening and believed that it could be used to prevent cervical cancer. Participants mentioned religious and cultural obligations of modesty, gender of healthcare providers, fear of disclosure of results, fear of nosocomial infections, lack of awareness, discrimination at hospitals, and need for spousal approval as barriers to uptake of screening. These barriers varied by religion across the geographical regions.

conclusionsBarriers to cervical cancer screening vary by religious affiliations. Interventions to increase cervical cancer awareness and screening uptake in multicultural and multireligious communities need to take into consideration the varying cultural and religious beliefs in order to design and implement effective cervical cancer screening intervention programmes.

Indexed as

ChristianityIslamAdultCultureEarly Detection of CancerFamily RelationsFearFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMass ScreeningNigeriaPatient Acceptance of Health CarePersonalityPhysician-Patient RelationsPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID26754174
PMCPMC4716205
OpenAlexW2286976689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.