Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26754141›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

The validity and responsiveness of the ICECAP-A capability-well-being measure in women with irritative lower urinary tract symptoms.

Ilias Goranitis, Joanna Coast, Hareth Al-Janabi, Pallavi Latthe, Tracy E Roberts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Scoring System for the Japanese Version of the ICECAP-A.Psychology research and behavior management · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Measurement properties of the ICECAP-A capability well-being instrument among dermatological patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Review
  17. Measuring broader wellbeing in mental health services: validity of the German language OxCAP-MH capability instrument.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ilias GoranitisHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Joanna CoastSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Hareth Al-JanabiHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Pallavi LattheSchool of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tracy E RobertsHealth Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. T.E.Roberts@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/22/122Medical Research Council G0701027Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA desire to incorporate broader aspects of well-being in health economic evaluations has led to the development of the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A). The ICECAP-A draws upon Amartya Sen's capability approach and conceptualises well-being as the capability to achieve Stability, Attachment, Autonomy, Achievement, and Enjoyment. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric performance of the ICECAP-A in a context where patient outcomes can extend beyond health-related quality of life.

methodsLongitudinal data were collected for 478 women with symptoms of urinary frequency and urgency, with or without incontinence. Women were recruited across 22 hospitals in the UK and had a mean age of 55 (SD 14). The psychometric performance of the measure was evaluated in relation to the EuroQol Five-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire for Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB) and involved an assessment of acceptability, construct validity, and responsiveness using parametric and nonparametric methods.

resultsICECAP-A showed good convergence with the ICIQ-OAB with 20 out of 22 expected patterns of relationship confirmed. Findings suggested that the ICECAP-A has better discriminative properties than EQ-5D-3L and as good as those of the ICIQ-OAB, confirming expected associations with clinical and demographic factors. The ICECAP-A was more responsive than EQ-5D-3L and ICIQ-OAB to deteriorations of clinical symptoms. Improvements in symptoms were not valued as highly as deteriorations by either ICECAP-A or EQ-5D-3L.

conclusionsThe ICECAP-A is a valid and responsive measure capturing broad emotional and practical impacts of urinary symptoms on women's well-being and could be considered for use in economic evaluations in this context.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUrinary Tract InfectionsEconomic evaluationEQ-5D-3LICECAP-AOutcome valuationOveractive bladderPsychometric validation

Identifiers

PMID26754141
PMCPMC4945699
OpenAlexW2239665848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.