ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2016
The involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: a mixed methods study in Australia.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Financial relationships between patient and consumer representatives and the health industry: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Pooled it
- Industry funding of patient and health consumer organisations: systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Pooled it
- Exploring Patient Organization Involvement in Stem Cell Research: Insights from the Lifeworld.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Management of Wilson disease across Europe: an international physician-oriented survey by the ERN-RARE Liver group.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Enhancing Equality, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Rare Disease Research in the United Kingdom.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Involvement of patient organisations in research activities: actions taken and lessons learned in a clinical research study for osteogenesis imperfecta.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Implementing Person-Centered, Clinical, and Research Navigation in Rare Cancers: The Canadian Cholangiocarcinoma Collaborative (C3).Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- "I just don't know enough": Australian perspectives on community involvement in health and medical research.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- How does the subjective well-being of Australian adults with a congenital corpus callosum disorder compare with that of the general Australian population?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- The Development and Impact of AYA Can-Canadian Cancer Advocacy: A Peer-Led Advocacy Organization for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- 'Advocacy groups are the connectors': Experiences and contributions of rare disease patient organization leaders in advanced neurotherapeutics.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Patient involvement in rare diseases research: a scoping review of the literature and mixed method evaluation of Norwegian researchers' experiences and perceptions.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- The involvement of rare disease patient organisations in therapeutic innovation across rare paediatric neurological conditions: a narrative review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Review
- Current Status of Genetic Counselling for Rare Diseases in Spain.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Quality Evaluation of Rare Disease Registries-An Assessment of the Essential Features of a Disease Registry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- My Data, My Choice? - German Patient Organizations' Attitudes towards Big Data-Driven Approaches in Personalized Medicine. An Empirical-Ethical Study.Journal of medical systems · 2021Article
- The urgent need to empower rare disease organizations in China: an interview-based study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Article
- To what degree are orphan drugs patient-centered? A review of the current state of clinical research in rare diseases.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Review
- The role of patient organizations in the rare disease ecosystem in India: an interview based study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Article
- Research activity and capability in the European reference network MetabERN.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe report here selected findings from a mixed-methods study investigating the role of Australian rare disease patient organisations (RDPOs) in research. Despite there being many examples of RDPOs that have initiated and supported significant scientific advances, there is little information - and none at all in Australia - about RDPOs generally, and their research-related goals, activities, and experiences. This information is a pre-requisite for understanding what RDPOs bring to research and how their involvement could be strengthened.
methodsWe reviewed 112 RDPO websites, conducted an online survey completed by 61 organisational leaders, and interviewed ten leaders and two key informants. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using basic descriptive statistics and content analysis, respectively.
resultsAlthough most are small volunteer-based groups, more than 90% of the surveyed RDPOs had a goal to promote or support research on the diseases affecting their members. Nearly all (95 %) had undertaken at least one research-related activity - such as providing funding or other support to researchers - in the previous five years. However, RDPO leaders reported considerable challenges in meeting their research goals. Difficulties most frequently identified were insufficient RDPO resources, and a perceived lack of researchers interested in studying their diseases. Other concerns included inadequate RDPO expertise in governing research "investments", and difficulty engaging researchers in the organisation's knowledge and ideas. We discuss these perceived challenges in the light of two systemic issues: the proliferation of and lack of collaboration between RDPOs, and the lack of specific governmental policies and resources supporting rare disease research and patient advocacy in Australia.
conclusionThis study provides unique information about the experiences of RDPOs generally, rather than experiences retrospectively reported by RDPOs associated with successful research. We describe RDPOs' valuable contributions to research, while also providing insights into the difficulties for small organisations trying to promote research. The study is relevant internationally because of what it tells us about RDPOs; however, we draw attention to specific opportunities in Australia to support RDPOs' involvement in research, for the benefit of current and future generations affected by rare diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.