Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26753892›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2016

Imipramine for Treatment of Esophageal Hypersensitivity and Functional Heartburn: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Julajak Limsrivilai, Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Somchai Leelakusolvong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Comparative Efficacy of Antidepressants for Symptoms Remission of Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. The Spectrum of Reflux Phenotypes.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Update on Functional Heartburn.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Response to Marsden and Ford.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
  20. Tricyclic Antidepressants: What to Choose and Which Dose?The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julajak LimsrivilaiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phunchai CharatcharoenwitthayaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nonthalee PausawasdiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Somchai LeelakusolvongDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTricyclic antidepressants could be effective in the treatment of symptoms related to hypersensitive esophagus through their pain-modulating effect. We therefore assessed the benefit of imipramine in patients with esophageal hypersensitivity and functional heartburn.

methodsPatients with normal endoscopy findings and typical reflux symptoms despite standard-dose proton-pump inhibitor therapy underwent 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. Patients with established esophageal hypersensitivity or functional heartburn were randomly assigned to receive 8 weeks of either once-daily imipramine 25 mg (n=43) or placebo (n=40). The primary end point was satisfactory relief of reflux symptoms, defined as a >50% reduction in the gastroesophageal reflux disease score. The secondary end point was improvement in quality-of-life (QoL) as assessed by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey score.

resultsPatients receiving imipramine did not achieve a higher rate of satisfactory relief of reflux symptoms than did patients receiving placebo (intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis: 37.2 vs. 37.5%, respectively; odds ratio (OR), 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41-2.41; per-protocol (PP) analysis: 45.5 vs. 41.2%, respectively; OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.45-3.13). Subgroup analysis to assess the efficacy of imipramine for either esophageal hypersensitivity or functional heartburn yielded similar results. Treatment with imipramine provided significant improvement of QoL by PP analysis (72±17 and 61±19, respectively; P=0.048), but ITT analysis did not reveal any differences between imipramine and placebo (68±19 and 61±19, respectively; P=0.26). Adverse events were similar in both groups; however, constipation was more common with imipramine than placebo (51.2 vs. 22.5%, respectively; P=0.01).

conclusionsAlthough low-dose imipramine shows potential QoL benefits, it does not relieve symptoms more effectively than does placebo in patients with either esophageal hypersensitivity or functional heartburn.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicDouble-Blind MethodEsophageal pH MonitoringFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHeartburnHumansHyperesthesiaImipramineMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicImipramine

Identifiers

PMID26753892
OpenAlexW2238708543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.