Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26753687›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2016

"Back to the future": Influence of beliefs regarding the future on TTO answers.

F E van Nooten, N J A van Exel, D Eriksson, W B F Brouwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What Makes the Time Tradeoff Tick? A Sociopsychological Explanation.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Do time trade-off values fully capture attitudes that are relevant to health-related choices?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Article
  7. What should we know about the person behind a TTO?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

F E van NootenInstitute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. floortjevannooten@hotmail.com.
N J A van ExelInstitute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vanexel@bmg.eur.nl.
D ErikssonQuantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden. daniel.eriksson@quantifyresearch.com.
W B F BrouwerInstitute of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. brouwer@bmg.eur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA common approach to obtain health state valuations is the time-tradeoff (TTO) method. Much remains unknown regarding the influence of responder characteristics on TTO answers. The objective of this study is to increase understanding of the influence that beliefs regarding future health and death, as well as desires to witness certain life events, have on respondents' health state valuations.

methodsAn online survey was designed, including three TTO questions using a 10 year timeframe. Moreover, respondents completed demographic questions, the Health-Risk Attitude Scale (HRAS), the Expectations Regarding Aging (ERA) questionnaire, questions about beliefs regarding future health (i.e. life expectancy) and death (i.e. fear of death, belief in life after death and opinion about euthanasia), and about important life events taking place within the TTO timeframe. Regression analyses were performed in order to assess the influence of these different variables.

resultsOne thousand sixty-seven respondents were included in the analyses. The following variables were significantly associated with years traded off: ERA mental health (decrease), ERA physical health (increase), HRAS (increase), support for euthanasia (increase), fear of death (decrease) and consideration of an important life event (decrease). The explained variance of the final model was low (0.08).

conclusionTTO responses may be influenced by considerations of future health, including life events and attitudes regarding health risks and death. Further investigation of TTO responses remains warranted.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathAttitude to HealthHealth StatusAdolescentAdultAgedAgingFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalQuality of LifeRegression AnalysisSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26753687
PMCPMC4709901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.