Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26753559›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2016

Determining optimal prostate-specific antigen thresholds to identify an increased 4-year risk of prostate cancer development: an analysis within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

S Scott Sutton, E David Crawford, Judd W Moul, James W Hardin, Eric Kruep

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S Scott SuttonSouth Carolina College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208-0001, USA. Sutton@sccp.sc.edu.
E David CrawfordUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Judd W MoulDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
James W HardinDorn Research Institute, WJB Dorn Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Columbia, SC, USA.
Eric KruepNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Dorn Research Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USNovartis (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Health · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) threshold value that optimally predicts future risk of prostate cancer (overall and by race) for a dispersed US population.

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of men in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System database. Men ≥ 40 years with a baseline PSA ≤ 4.0 ng/mL, not receiving 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, and without a prostate cancer diagnosis prior to baseline PSA date were included and followed for 4 years. Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer within 6 months of baseline were excluded. The optimal PSA threshold value for future 4-year prostate cancer risk was determined by maximizing Youden's index.

resultsThe eligible population for the final analysis included 41,250 Caucasian (n = 24,518; 59.4 %) and African American (n = 16,732; 40.6 %) patients. The 4-year prostate cancer rate was 3.08 % overall, and race-specific rates were 3.02 and 3.17 % for Caucasian and African American men, respectively. Mean time to prostate cancer diagnosis was 2.01 years across all patients. Race-specific PSA thresholds that optimally predicted future prostate cancer were 2.5 ng/mL [area under the curve (AUC) = 80.3 %] in Caucasians and a 1.9 ng/mL (AUC = 85.4 %) in African Americans; across all patients, a 2.4 ng/mL threshold was optimal (AUC = 82.5 %).

conclusionsIn the VA population, a relatively low PSA threshold of ~2.5 ng/mL was optimal in predicting prostate cancer within 4 years overall and for Caucasian men, but an even lower threshold of 1.9 ng/mL was applicable for African American men.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanWhite PeopleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime FactorsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans HealthProstate-Specific AntigenAfrican AmericanCaucasianProstate-specific antigenProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26753559
OpenAlexW2238112150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.