SynthesisJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2017
Reproducibility of transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements in clinical practice: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of changes in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation blood flow on the measurement of intrathoracic blood volume and extravascular lung water index: a prospective interventional study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023Trial
- Do ScvOPhysiological reports · 2021Trial
- Comparative assessment of extravascular lung water index in ARDS patients on veno-venous ECMO: transpulmonary thermodilution versus AI-driven chest CT segmentation.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Observational
- Septic Cardiomyopathy: Age-Dependent Physiology and Hemodynamic Aspects-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Quantification of pulmonary edema using automated lung segmentation on computed tomography in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- Potential bias and misclassification of using continuous cardiac output to identify fluid responsiveness compared to calibrated measurements.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- A comparison of hemodynamic measurement methods during orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluating agreement and trending ability of PiCCO versus pulmonary artery catheter techniques.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Predictive role of hepatic venous pressure gradient in bleeding events among patients with cirrhosis undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2024 · on this mapArticle
- Haemodynamic monitoring in acute heart failure - what you need to know.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2022Review
- Cardiac output monitoring with pulmonary versus trans-cardiopulmonary thermodilution in left ventricular assist devices: Interchangeable methods?Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Transpulmonary thermodilution in patients treated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.Annals of intensive care · 2021Article
- The effects of hemodynamic monitoring using the PiCCO system on critically ill patients.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2017 end of year summary: cardiovascular and hemodynamic monitoring.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2018Review
- Cardiac Output Monitoring in Preterm Infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring cardiac output (CO) is an integral part of the diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in critically ill patients. During the last decade, the single transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique was implemented in clinical practice. The purpose of this paper was to systematically review and critically assess the existing data concerning the reproducibility of CO measured using TPTD (COTPTD). A total of 16 studies were identified to potentially be included in our study because these studies had the required information that allowed for calculating the reproducibility of COTPTD measurements. 14 adult studies and 2 pediatric studies were analyzed. In total, 3432 averaged CO values in the adult population and 78 averaged CO values in the pediatric population were analyzed. The overall reproducibility of COTPTD measurements was 6.1 ± 2.0 % in the adult studies and 3.9 ± 2.9 % in the pediatric studies. An average of 3 boluses was necessary for obtaining a mean CO value. Achieving more than 3 boluses did not improve reproducibility; however, achieving less than 3 boluses significantly affects the reproducibility of this technique. The present results emphasize that TPTD is a highly reproducible technique for monitoring CO in critically ill patients, especially in the pediatric population. Our findings suggest that obtaining a mean of 3 measurements for determining CO values is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.