Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26753114›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

Prediction of extubation failure in newborns, infants and children: brief report of a prospective (blinded) cohort study at a tertiary care paediatric centre in India.

Bedangshu Saikia, Nirmal Kumar, Vishnubhatla Sreenivas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Research advances in validity of predictors for extubation outcome in children receiving invasive mechanical ventilation].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  7. [Advances in respiratory assessment and treatment in children undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bedangshu SaikiaDepartment of Paediatrics and Neonatology, St Stephens Hospital, Tis Hazari, New Delhi, 110054 India.
Nirmal KumarDepartment of Paediatrics and Neonatology, St Stephens Hospital, Tis Hazari, New Delhi, 110054 India.
Vishnubhatla SreenivasDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029 India.
St. Stephen’s Hospital · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtubation failure (EF), defined as need for re-intubation within 24-72 h, is multifactorial. Factors predicting EF in adults generally are not useful in children.

objectiveTo determine the factors associated with EF and to facilitate prediction of EF in mechanically ventilated infants and children less than 12 years of age. MATERIAL AND

methodsDesign Prospective cohort study. Setting PICU and NICU of a multispecialty tertiary care institute. Patients All consecutive newborns, infants and children, who remained on the ventilator for more than 12 h, were included. Patients with upper airway obstruction, neuromuscular disorders, complex anatomic malformations, accidental extubation, tracheostomy or death before extubation were excluded. Methods The pre-extubation clinical, laboratory and ventilatory parameters were collected for 92 cases over a one and half year period. The EF rate was calculated for each variable using STATA 9. All the treating physicians were blinded to the data collection procedure. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsDemographics were comparable between the extubation success and EF groups. Respiratory failure was the main cause requiring ventilation (46.74 %, 95 % CI 0.37-0.57) as well as EF (30.23 %, 95 % CI 0.08-0.23). 76.92 % (95 % CI 0.58-0.89) of patients that failed extubation had alterations in respiratory effort, 38.46 % (95 % CI 0.22-0.57) each had either poor or increased respiratory effort. Poor cough reflex (p = 0.001), thick endotracheal secretions (p = 0.02), failed spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) (p = 0.001) and higher rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) (p = 0.001) were found to be associated with EF.

conclusionsPaediatric EF is multifactorial. Increased or poor respiratory effort and failed SBT are potential factors in deciding re-intubation. Increased RSBI, poor cough reflex and thick.

Indexed as

Extubation failurePoor cough reflexRapid shallow breathing indexRespiratory effortSpontaneous breathing trialThick secretions

Identifiers

PMID26753114
PMCPMC4695462
OpenAlexW2202769639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.