Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26753066›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of radiology2015

Combined value of apparent diffusion coefficient-standardized uptake value max in evaluation of post-treated locally advanced rectal cancer.

Davide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diffusion-weighted MRI andEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide IppolitoDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Davide FiorDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Chiara TratteneroDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Elena De PontiDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Silvia DragoDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Luca GuerraDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Cammillo Talei FranzesiDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Sandro SironiDavide Ippolito, Davide Fior, Chiara Trattenero, Elena De Ponti, Silvia Drago, Luca Guerra, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITCreative Research Enterprises (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the clinical diagnostic value of functional imaging, combining quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and standardized uptake value (SUV)max, before and after chemo-radiation therapy, in prediction of tumor response of patients with rectal cancer, related to tumor regression grade at histology.

methodsA total of 31 patients with biopsy proven diagnosis of rectal carcinoma were enrolled in our study. All patients underwent a whole body (18)FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan and a pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) examination including diffusion weighted (DW) imaging for staging (PET1, RM1) and after completion (6.6 wk) of neoadjuvant treatment (PET2, RM2). Subsequently all patients underwent total mesorectal excision and the histological results were compared with imaging findings. The MR scanning, performed on 1.5 T magnet (Philips, Achieva), included T2-weighted multiplanar imaging and in addition DW images with b-value of 0 and 1000 mm²/s. On PET/CT the SUVmax of the rectal lesion were calculated in PET1 and PET2. The percentage decrease of SUVmax (ΔSUV) and ADC (ΔADC) values from baseline to presurgical scan were assessed and correlated with pathologic response classified as tumor regression grade (Mandard's criteria; TRG1 = complete regression, TRG5 = no regression).

resultsAfter completion of therapy, all the patients were submitted to surgery. According to the Mandard's criteria, 22 tumors showed complete (TRG1) or subtotal regression (TRG2) and were classified as responders; 9 tumors were classified as non responders (TRG3, 4 and 5). Considering all patients the mean values of SUVmax in PET 1 was higher than the mean value of SUVmax in PET 2 (P < 0.001), whereas the mean ADC values was lower in RM1 than RM2 (P < 0.001), with a ΔSUV and ΔADC respectively of 60.2% and 66.8%. The best predictors for TRG response were SUV2 (threshold of 4.4) and ADC2 (1.29 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) with high sensitivity and specificity. Combining in a single analysis both the obtained median value, the positive predictive value, in predicting the different group category response in related to TRG system, presented R(2) of 0.95.

conclusionThe functional imaging combining ADC and SUVmax in a single analysis permits to detect changes in cellular tissue structures useful for the assessment of tumour response after the neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer, increasing the sensitivity in correct depiction of treatment response than either method alone.

Indexed as

Advanced rectal cancerApparent diffusion coefficientFDG-PET/CTFunctional imagingMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant treatmentTumor regression grade

Identifiers

PMID26753066
PMCPMC4697125
OpenAlexW2396246428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.