Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26753001›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2015

HOMA-IR is associated with significant angiographic coronary artery disease in non-diabetic, non-obese individuals: a cross-sectional study.

Márcio Mossmann, Marco V Wainstein, Sandro C Gonçalves, Rodrigo V Wainstein, Gabriela L Gravina, Marlei Sangalli, Francine Veadrigo, Roselene Matte, Rejane Reich, Fernanda G Costa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Relationship Between Systemic Inflammation and Glycemic Control in Firefighters.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Márcio MossmannCardiology Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Marco V WainsteinCardiology Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Sandro C GonçalvesCardiology Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Rodrigo V WainsteinCardiology Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Gabriela L GravinaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Marlei SangalliUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Francine VeadrigoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Roselene MatteUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Rejane ReichUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Fernanda G CostaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Marcello C BertoluciInternal Medicine Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Medicina: Ciências Médicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcellos 2350, Room 700, Porto Alegre, 90035-903 Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledInsulin resistance is a major component of metabolic syndrome, type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Although important in T2DM, its role as a predictor of CAD in non-diabetic patients is less studied. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the association of HOMA-IR with significant CAD, determined by coronary angiography in non-obese, non-T2DM patients. We also evaluate the association between 3 oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) based insulin sensitivity indexes (Matsuda, STUMVOLL-ISI and OGIS) and CAD. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 54 non-obese, non-diabetic individuals referred for coronary angiography due to suspected CAD. CAD was classified as the "anatomic burden score" corresponding to any stenosis equal or larger than 50 % in diameter on the coronary distribution. Patients without lesions were included in No-CAD group. Patients with at least 1 lesion were included in the CAD group. A 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with measurements of plasma glucose and serum insulin at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min was obtained to calculate insulin sensitivity parameters. HOMA-IR results were ranked and patients were also categorized into insulin resistant (IR) or non-insulin resistant (NIR) if they were respectively above or below the 75th percentile (HOMA-IR > 4.21). The insulin sensitivity tests results were also divided into IR and NIR, respectively below and above each 25th percentile. Chi square was used to study association. Poisson Regression Model was used to compare prevalence ratios between categorized CAD and IR groups.

resultsFifty-four patients were included in the study. There were 26 patients (48 %) with significant CAD. The presence of clinically significant CAD was significant associated with HOMA-IR above p75 (Chi square 4.103, p = 0.0428) and 71 % of patients with HOMA-IR above p75 had significant CAD. Subjects with CAD had increased prevalence ratio of HOMA-IR above p75 compared to subjects without CAD (PR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.079-2.95; p = 0.024). Matsuda index, Stumvoll-ISI and OGIS index were not associated with significant CAD. We concluded that, in patients without diabetes or obesity, in whom a coronary angiography study is indicated, a single determination of HOMA-IR above 4.21 indicates increased risk for clinical significant coronary disease. The same association was not seen with insulin sensitivity indexes such as Matsuda, Stunvoll-ISI or OGIS. These findings support the need for further longitudinal research using HOMA-IR as a predictor of cardiovascular disease.

Identifiers

PMID26753001
PMCPMC4706182
OpenAlexW2195600900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.