ArticlePloS one2016
Promise and Challenge of DNA Barcoding in Venus Slipper (Paphiopedilum).
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unlocking the Genetic Identity of EndangeredGenes · 2024Article
- RNA barcode segments for SARS-CoV-2 identification from HCoVs and SARSr-CoV-2 lineages.Virologica Sinica · 2024Article
- Orchidaceae-Derived Anticancer Agents: A Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of NineFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Re-evaluation of the phylogenetic relationships and species delimitation of two closely related families (Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae) using two DNA barcode markers.Journal of biosciences · 2020Article
- Genetic Diversity and Identification of VietnameseBiology · 2019Article
- Efficient Identification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Development and characterization of polymorphic EST-SSR markers forApplications in plant sciences · 2018Article
- In Silico Study on Molecular Sequences for Identification ofEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2018Article
- Replacing Sanger with Next Generation Sequencing to improve coverage and quality of reference DNA barcodes for plants.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- An analysis of Echinacea chloroplast genomes: Implications for future botanical identification.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Evaluation of DNA barcodes in Codonopsis (Campanulaceae) and in some large angiosperm plant genera.PloS one · 2017Article
- The first initiative of DNA barcoding of ornamental plants from Egypt and potential applications in horticulture industry.PloS one · 2017Article
- DNA Barcoding Evaluation and Its Taxonomic Implications in the Recently Evolved GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Efficient Identification of the Forest Tree Species in Aceraceae Using DNA Barcodes.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orchidaceae are one of the largest families of flowering plants, with over 27,000 species described and all orchids are listed in CITES. Moreover, the seedlings of orchid species from the same genus are similar. The objective of DNA barcoding is rapid, accurate, and automated species identification, which may be used to identify illegally traded endangered species from vegetative specimens of Paphiopedilum (Venus slipper), a flagship group for plant conservation with high ornamental and commercial values. Here, we selected eight chloroplast barcodes and nrITS to evaluate their suitability in Venus slippers. The results indicate that all tested barcodes had no barcoding gap and the core plant barcodes showed low resolution for the identification of Venus slippers (18.86%). Of the single-locus barcodes, nrITS is the most efficient for the species identification of the genus (52.27%), whereas matK + atpF-atpH is the most efficient multi-locus combination (28.97%). Therefore, we recommend the combination of matK + atpF-atpH + ITS as a barcode for Venus slippers. Furthermore, there is an upper limit of resolution of the candidate barcodes, and only half of the taxa with multiple samples were identified successfully. The low efficiency of these candidate barcodes in Venus slippers may be caused by relatively recent speciation, the upper limit of the barcodes, and/or the sampling density. Although the discriminatory power is relatively low, DNA barcoding may be a promising tool to identify species involved in illegal trade, which has broad applications and is valuable for orchid conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.