ArticleScientific reports2016
Modified inflammation-based score as an independent malignant predictor in patients with pulmonary focal ground-glass opacity: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Necessity of organized low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: From epidemiologic comparisons between China and the Western nations.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- Limited effect of antibiotic use on the management of pulmonary ground-glass nodules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ground-Glass Opacities in the Access Route and Biopsy in Highly Perfused Dependent Areas of the Lungs as Risk Factors for Pulmonary Hemorrhage During CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: A Retrospective Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Advances in intelligent diagnosis methods for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules.Biomedical engineering online · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary focal Ground-glass Opacities (fGGOs) would frequently be identified after widely implementation of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening. Because of the high false-positive rate of LDCT, antibiotics should be regarded as advocates in clinical management for detected fGGOs. Retrospectively review consecutive patients with fGGOs between August 2006 and August 2012. Then, relative Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) were constructed in three different systems, traditional GPS system (tGPS), modified GPS system 1 (m1GPS), and modified GPS system 2 (m2GPS). Moreover, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed in balancing baseline covariates. After PSM, patients were matched and included in benign and malignant groups as 1:1 ratio. All reported parameters were balanced in both groups and no statistical differences could be detected. Finally, m1GPS exhibited remarkable different distribution between benign and malignant fGGOs. In detail, m1GPS 1 was more frequently observed in benign fGGOs nodules, while m1GPS 2 in malignant fGGOs nodules. Modified inflammation-based score was identified as an independent predictor of malignancies in patients with pulmonary fGGOs. Patients with m1GPS 1 were more likely to be benign fGGOs, while victims with m1GPS 2 more likely to be malignant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.