Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26752563›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Distinct Clinicopathological Entity Transcending Histological Distinction.

K Raghav, J T French, N T Ueno, X Lei, S Krishnamurthy, J M Reuben, V Valero, N K Ibrahim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K RaghavDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Divison of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
J T FrenchDivision of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
N T UenoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Divison of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
X LeiDepartment of Biostatistics, Divison of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
S KrishnamurthyDepartment of Pathology, Divison of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
J M ReubenDepartment of Hematopathology, Divison of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
V ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Divison of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
N K IbrahimDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Divison of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough well recognized in breast oncology literature, histologic subtypes have not been previously described in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The purpose of this study was to describe lobular subtype in IBC and assess the impact of histology on patient outcomes.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 659 IBC patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1984 and December 2009. Patients with Invasive Lobular, Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular, or Invasive Ducal Carcinomas (ILC, MIC, IDC, respectively) comprise the subject of this report. Patient characteristics and survival estimates were compared by using chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank statistic. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine association of histology with outcomes after adjustment for other characteristics.

resultsA total of 30, 37, and 592 patients were seen to have invasive lobular, mixed, or ductal histology, respectively. Grade 3 tumors were more common in the ductal group (78%) than in the lobular (60%) or mixed (61%) group (P = 0.01). The 3-year overall survival rates were 68%, 64%, and 62% in the lobular, mixed, and ductal groups, respectively (P = 0.68). After adjustment, histology did not have a significant effect on death in the lobular group (HR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-1.94; P = 0.50) or mixed group (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.25-1.13; P = 0.10) compared with the ductal group.

conclusionIn this cohort of IBC patients, lobular histology was seen in 4.5% cases. Histology does not appear to have a significant effect on survival outcomes in IBC patients, unlike in patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer (n-IBC), indicating the distinct biological behavior of the IBC phenotype.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleHistocytochemistryHumansInflammatory Breast NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhenotypeProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26752563
PMCPMC4709074
OpenAlexW2237963348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.