Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26752510›Full record

ArticleImmunology and cell biology2016

Nasal vaccination stimulates CD8(+) T cells for potent protection against mucosal Brucella melitensis challenge.

Beata Clapp, Xinghong Yang, Theresa Thornburg, Nancy Walters, David W Pascual

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology and cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of immune responses toFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Intranasal and intraperitoneal immunization againstClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. B Cells Inhibit CD4Infection and immunity · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Immune Response to MucosalFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beata ClappDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Xinghong YangDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Theresa ThornburgDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Nancy WaltersDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
David W PascualDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Montana State University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

"Subunit Vaccines for Brucella Pathogens"R01AI093372 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PASCUAL, DAVID W · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis remains a significant zoonotic threat worldwide. Humans and animals acquire infection via their oropharynx and upper respiratory tract following oral or aerosol exposure. After mucosal infection, brucellosis develops into a systemic disease. Mucosal vaccination could offer a viable alternative to conventional injection practices to deter disease. Using a nasal vaccination approach, the ΔznuA B. melitensis was found to confer potent protection against pulmonary Brucella challenge, and reduce colonization of spleens and lungs by more than 2500-fold, with >50% of vaccinated mice showing no detectable brucellae. Furthermore, 10-fold more brucellae-specific, interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-producing CD8(+) T cells than CD4(+) T cells were induced in the spleen and respiratory lymph nodes. Evaluation of pulmonary and splenic CD8(+) T cells from mice vaccinated with ΔznuA B. melitensis revealed that these expressed an activated effector memory (CD44(hi)CD62L(lo)CCR7(lo)) T cells producing elevated levels of IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, perforin and granzyme B. To assess the relative importance of these increased numbers of CD8(+) T cells, CD8(-/-) mice were challenged with virulent B. melitensis, and they showed markedly increased bacterial loads in organs in contrast to similarly challenged CD4(-/-) mice. Only ΔznuA B. melitensis- and Rev-1-vaccinated CD4(-/-) and wild-type mice, not CD8(-/-) mice, were completely protected against Brucella challenge. Determination of cytokines responsible for conferring protection showed the relative importance of IFN-γ, but not interleukin-17 (IL-17). Unlike wild-type (wt) mice, IL-17 was greatly induced in IFN-γ(-/-) mice, but IL-17 could not substitute for IFN-γ's protection, although an increase in brucellae dissemination was observed upon in vivo IL-17 neutralization. These results show that nasal ΔznuA B. melitensis vaccination represents an attractive means to stimulate systemic and mucosal immune protection via CD8(+) T-cell engagement.

Indexed as

VaccinationAnimalsBacterial VaccinesBrucella melitensisBrucellosisCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesFemaleImmunologic MemoryInflammation MediatorsInterferon-gammaLungMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLNasal MucosaBacterial VaccinesCytokinesInflammation MediatorsInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID26752510
PMCPMC4879022
OpenAlexW2237942997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.