Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26752012›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical education2016

A pilot study of orthopaedic resident self-assessment using a milestones' survey just prior to milestones implementation.

Kendall E Bradley, Kathryn M Andolsek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Technical Obstacles in Total Knee Arthroplasty Learning: A Steps Breakdown Evaluation.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2019
    Article
  7. Progressive Surgical Autonomy in a Plastic Surgery Resident Clinic.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2017
    Article
  8. The Promise of Milestones: Are They Living Up to Our Expectations?Journal of graduate medical education · 2017
    Article
  9. Fringe Benefits Among US Orthopedic Residency Programs Vary Considerably: a National Survey.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kendall E BradleyOrthopaedic Surgery Residency Training Program, Duke University Hospital, Box 3648 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Kathryn M AndolsekCommunity and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3648 DUMC, 201 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

Funding

Pilot Project for the DTMI CRA ProgramUL1RR024128 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT M · 2006 to 2010
$48.1M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo pilot test if Orthopaedic Surgery residents could self-assess their performance using newly created milestones, as defined by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education.

methodsIn June 2012, an email was sent to Program Directors and administrative coordinators of the 154 accredited Orthopaedic Surgery Programs, asking them to send their residents a link to an online survey. The survey was adapted from the Orthopaedic Surgery Milestone Project. Completed surveys were aggregated in an anonymous, confidential database. SAS 9.3 was used to perform the analyses.

resultsResponses from 71 residents were analyzed. First and second year residents indicated through self-assessment that they had substantially achieved Level 1 and Level 2 milestones. Third year residents reported they had substantially achieved 30/41, and fourth year residents, all Level 3 milestones. Fifth year, graduating residents, reported they had substantially achieved 17 Level 4 milestones, and were extremely close on another 15. No milestone was rated at Level 5, the maximum possible. Earlier in training, Patient Care and Medical Knowledge milestones were rated lower than the milestones reflecting the other four competencies of Practice Based Learning and Improvement, Systems Based Practice, Professionalism, and Interpersonal Communication. The gap was closed by the fourth year.

conclusionsResidents were able to successfully self-assess using the 41 Orthopaedic Surgery milestones. Respondents' rate improved proficiency over time. Graduating residents report they have substantially, or close to substantially, achieved all Level 4 milestones. Milestone self-assessment may be a useful tool as one component of a program's overall performance assessment strategy.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencySelf-AssessmentCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleOrthopedicsPilot ProjectsSurveys and Questionnairescompetency based educationgraduate medical educationmilestonespostgraduate medical educationself-assessment

Identifiers

PMID26752012
PMCPMC4715902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.