Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26751780›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Rhythmic coordination of hippocampal neurons during associative memory processing.

Lara M Rangel, Jon W Rueckemann, Pamela D Riviere, Katherine R Keefe, Blake S Porter, Ian S Heimbuch, Carl H Budlong, Howard Eichenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Decision-Making Time Cells in Hippocampal Dorsal CA1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Pattern dynamics and stochasticity of the brain rhythms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lara M RangelCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Jon W RueckemannCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Pamela D RiviereCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Katherine R KeefeCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Blake S PorterCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1278-0289
Ian S HeimbuchCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Carl H BudlongCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.
Howard EichenbaumCenter for Memory and Brain, Boston University, Boston, United States.

Funding

COMPARATIVE COGNITION AND HIPPOCAMPAL FUNCTIONR01MH052090 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 1994 to 2020
$6.4M
HIPPOCAMPAL AND CORTICAL CODING IN MEMORYR01MH051570 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI HASSELMO, MICHAEL E · 1995 to 2018
$6.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH052090NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH051570NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal oscillations are dynamic, with unique oscillatory frequencies present during different behavioral states. To examine the extent to which these oscillations reflect neuron engagement in distinct local circuit processes that are important for memory, we recorded single cell and local field potential activity from the CA1 region of the hippocampus as rats performed a context-guided odor-reward association task. We found that theta (4-12 Hz), beta (15-35 Hz), low gamma (35-55 Hz), and high gamma (65-90 Hz) frequencies exhibited dynamic amplitude profiles as rats sampled odor cues. Interneurons and principal cells exhibited unique engagement in each of the four rhythmic circuits in a manner that related to successful performance of the task. Moreover, principal cells coherent to each rhythm differentially represented task dimensions. These results demonstrate that distinct processing states arise from the engagement of rhythmically identifiable circuits, which have unique roles in organizing task-relevant processing in the hippocampus.

Indexed as

MemoryAnimalsBrain WavesHippocampusNeuronsOdorantsRatsbetaCA1gammahippocampusneuroscienceoscillationsrattheta

Identifiers

PMID26751780
PMCPMC4718808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.