Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26751623›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2016

Reliability and validity of measures of impulsive choice and impulsive action in smokers trying to quit.

Danielle E McCarthy, Krysten W Bold, Haruka Minami, Vivian M Yeh, Emily Rutten, Shruti G Nadkarni, Gretchen B Chapman

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle E McCarthyDepartment of Psychology and Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Krysten W BoldDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine.
Haruka MinamiDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University.
Vivian M YehDeloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.
Emily RuttenMetro Psychology Support Services.
Shruti G NadkarniNew Jersey Center for Science, Technology and Mathematics, Kean University.
Gretchen B ChapmanDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.

Funding

Research Training Program in Substance Use PreventionT32DA019426 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMI P SULLIVAN · 2005 to 2026
$7.5M
Phenotypic Markers for Smoking Cessation: Impulsive Choice and Impulsive ActionRC1DA028129 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MCCARTHY, DANIELLE ERIN · 2009 to 2010
$734k
Evaluation of Learning-Theory-Based Smoking Cessation StrategiesR21DA026511 · NIDA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MCCARTHY, DANIELLE ERIN · 2010 to 2011
$430k
NIDA NIH HHS 1R21DA026511-01A1NIDA NIH HHS 1RC1DA028129-01NIDA NIH HHS RC1 DA028129NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA019426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-sectional research suggests that smokers are more impulsive than are nonsmokers, but few studies have examined relations between impulsiveness and later success in quitting smoking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and predictive validity of facets of impulsiveness in adult smokers trying to quit. Baseline behavioral measures of impulsive choice (assessed with a delay discounting task) and impulsive action (assessed with a measure of behavioral disinhibition) were used as predictors of smoking cessation success over 12 weeks. The sample included 116 adult (18 years old or older) daily smokers from central New Jersey. Impulsive choice, impulsive action, and self-reported impulsiveness were not significantly related to one another at baseline. Impulsive choice had high test-retest reliability from pre- to postquit, whereas impulsive action was less stable. Test-retest reliability from prequit to 3 weeks' postquit was moderated by achievement of 7-day abstinence. Baseline impulsive action was significantly negatively related to quitting for at least 1 day in the first 2 weeks of a quit attempt and of prolonged abstinence (no relapse over the next 10 weeks). Baseline impulsive choice was robustly associated with biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalence abstinence 12 weeks' postquit, such that those with lower delay discounting were more likely to achieve abstinence. Facets of impulsiveness appear to function largely independently in adult smokers, as indicated by their lack of intercorrelation, differential stability, and differential relations with abstinence. Impulsive action may impede initial quitting, whereas impulsive choice may be an obstacle to maintaining lasting abstinence.

Indexed as

Behavior Rating ScaleChoice BehaviorImpulsive BehaviorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelay DiscountingFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSmoking CessationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26751623
PMCPMC4887270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.