Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26751509›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2016

CRISPR-Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action.

Gil Amitai, Rotem Sorek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 223 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
223citing papers in PubMed
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

223 citing papers in PubMed, 408 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Engineering Microbial Particles for Next-Generation Biomedical Platforms.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Comparative Genomics and Adaptive Evolution ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

163 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gil AmitaiDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Rotem SorekDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first demonstration that CRISPR-Cas systems provide bacteria and archaea with adaptive immunity against phages and plasmids, numerous studies have yielded key insights into the molecular mechanisms governing how these systems attack and degrade foreign DNA. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the adaptation stage, in which new immunological memory is formed, have until recently represented a major unresolved question. In this Progress article, we discuss recent discoveries that have shown both how foreign DNA is identified by the CRISPR-Cas adaptation machinery and the molecular basis for its integration into the chromosome to form an immunological memory. Furthermore, we describe the roles of each of the specific CRISPR-Cas components that are involved in memory formation, and consider current models for their evolutionary origin.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaBiological EvolutionCell Cycle ProteinsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNADNA, IntergenicGene Expression RegulationRepressor ProteinsRNASaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCDC36 protein, S cerevisiaeCell Cycle ProteinsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDNADNA, IntergenicRepressor ProteinsRNASaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26751509
OpenAlexW2235762536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.