Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26751460›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

Personal Care Product Use in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Implications for Exposure Assessment.

Carly Lang, Mandy Fisher, Angelica Neisa, Leona MacKinnon, Sandra Kuchta, Susan MacPherson, Adam Probert, Tye E Arbuckle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carly LangIndependent Research Nurse Consultant, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. carlylang@gmail.com.
Mandy FisherPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Dr., AL 0801A, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. mandy.fisher@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Angelica NeisaPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Dr., AL 0801A, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. angelica.neisa@gmail.com.
Leona MacKinnonPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Dr., AL 0801A, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. Leona.MacKinnon@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Sandra KuchtaPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Dr., AL 0801A, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. Sandra.Kuchta@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Susan MacPhersonPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Dr., AL 0801A, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. Susan.H.MacPherson@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Adam ProbertPopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Dr., AL 0801A, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. adam.probert@hc-sc.gc.ca.
Tye E ArbucklePopulation Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, 50 Colombine Dr., AL 0801A, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada. tye.arbuckle@hc-sc.gc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concern regarding the potential for developmental health risks associated with certain chemicals (e.g., phthalates, antibacterials) used in personal care products is well documented; however, current exposure data for pregnant women are limited. The objective of this study was to describe the pattern of personal care product use in pregnancy and the post-partum period. Usage patterns of personal care products were collected at six different time points during pregnancy and once in the postpartum period for a cohort of 80 pregnant women in Ottawa, Canada. The pattern of use was then described and groups of personal care product groups commonly used together were identified using hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed that product use varied by income and country of birth. General hygiene products were the most commonly used products and were consistently used over time while cosmetic product use declined with advancing pregnancy and post-delivery. Hand soaps and baby products were reported as used more frequently after birth. This study is the first to track personal care product use across pregnancy and into the postpartum period, and suggests that pregnant populations may be a unique group of personal care product users. This information will be useful for exposure assessments.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCanadaCohort StudiesCosmeticsFemaleHumansHygiene ProductsInfantPhthalic AcidsPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk AssessmentSelf CareSoapsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCosmeticsHygiene Productsphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsSoapsconcurrent useexposurepersonal care productspregnancyreproductive healthuse patterns

Identifiers

PMID26751460
PMCPMC4730496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.