Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26750305›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2016

Open Source Bayesian Models. 3. Composite Models for Prediction of Binned Responses.

Alex M Clark, Krishna Dole, Sean Ekins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Data Mining and Computational Modeling of High-Throughput Screening Datasets.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex M ClarkMolecular Materials Informatics, Inc. , 1900 St. Jacques #302, Montreal H3J 2S1, Quebec, Canada.
Krishna DoleCollaborative Drug Discovery, Inc. , 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 342, Burlingame, California 94010, United States.
Sean EkinsCollaborative Drug Discovery, Inc. , 1633 Bayshore Highway, Suite 342, Burlingame, California 94010, United States.

Funding

Biocomputation across distributed private datasets to enhance drug discoveryR44TR000942 · NCATS · COLLABORATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY, INC. · PI BUNIN, BARRY A · 2013 to 2018
$2.9M
Identification and Validation of Targets of Phenotypic High Throughput ScreeningR41AI108003 · NIAID · COLLABORATIVE DRUG DISCOVERY, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2013 to 2013
$255k
NCATS NIH HHS 9R44TR000942-02NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR000942NIAID NIH HHS R41 AI108003NIAID NIH HHS R41-AI108003-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian models constructed from structure-derived fingerprints have been a popular and useful method for drug discovery research when applied to bioactivity measurements that can be effectively classified as active or inactive. The results can be used to rank candidate structures according to their probability of activity, and this ranking benefits from the high degree of interpretability when structure-based fingerprints are used, making the results chemically intuitive. Besides selecting an activity threshold, building a Bayesian model is fast and requires few or no parameters or user intervention. The method also does not suffer from such acute overtraining problems as quantitative structure-activity relationships or quantitative structure-property relationships (QSAR/QSPR). This makes it an approach highly suitable for automated workflows that are independent of user expertise or prior knowledge of the training data. We now describe a new method for creating a composite group of Bayesian models to extend the method to work with multiple states, rather than just binary. Incoming activities are divided into bins, each covering a mutually exclusive range of activities. For each of these bins, a Bayesian model is created to model whether or not the compound belongs in the bin. Analyzing putative molecules using the composite model involves making a prediction for each bin and examining the relative likelihood for each assignment, for example, highest value wins. The method has been evaluated on a collection of hundreds of data sets extracted from ChEMBL v20 and validated data sets for ADME/Tox and bioactivity.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, TheoreticalQuantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID26750305
PMCPMC4764945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.