Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26750134›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2016

Is personality relevant in the choice of bleaching?

A Herrera, J Martín, F Pérez, E Bonafé, A Reis, A Loguercio Dourado, E Fernández

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03118323 (Patients' Willingness-to-pay of Endodontic Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03118323 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Patients' Willingness-to-pay of Endodontic Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of GöttingenRan2017 to 2021Enrolled200ConditionsPatient PreferenceArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A HerreraDepartment of Basic Sciences-Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Sergio Livingstone Pohlhammer 943, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.
J MartínDepartment of Restorative Dentistry-Faculty of Dentistry, Dental School, University of Chile, Sergio Livingstone Pohlhammer 943, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.
F PérezDepartment of Restorative Dentistry-Faculty of Dentistry, Dental School, University of Chile, Sergio Livingstone Pohlhammer 943, Independencia, Santiago, Chile.
E BonaféUniversidade Estadual Ponta Grossa, Av. General Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil.
A ReisUniversidade Estadual Ponta Grossa, Av. General Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil.
A Loguercio DouradoUniversidade Estadual Ponta Grossa, Av. General Carlos Cavalcanti, 4748, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 84030-900, Brazil.
E FernándezDepartment of Restorative Dentistry-Faculty of Dentistry, Dental School, University of Chile, Sergio Livingstone Pohlhammer 943, Independencia, Santiago, Chile. edofdez@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-1510
University of Chile · CLUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose was to administer the NEO-FFI personality test to patients who did and did not want to have their teeth bleached and before and after bleaching to the participants who accepted the treatment. The research question is to correlate styles and personality factors with bleaching. MATERIALS AND

methodsThere were 128 patients eligible for bleaching; 58 accepted (AB) while 70 refused (RB). The test was administered to both groups (AB-RB). The group AB was administered before and 1 week after the end of the bleaching. For each personality domain comparison, the Mann-Whitney test was used. For the group AB, the results for each domain before and after bleaching were compared using the Wilcoxon test.

resultsThere was a significant difference between the groups (AB-RB) in the extraversion factor (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between any of the personality items before and after bleaching (p > 0.1). The comparison between groups by sex revealed significant differences in extraversion and neuroticism factors. Males who AB scored higher in extraversion than males who RB (p < 0.05). Females scored higher in neuroticism than males who AB (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThere were personality differences between people who decided to bleach compared with those who did not want the bleaching, which was mainly in the extroversion factor. This stereotypes the patients, who could be described as more sociable, extroverted, and concerned about esthetics and cleanliness. The bleaching protocol, however, cannot modify any of the personality factors. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: It is important to understand a patient's behavior to meet their needs and to determine the type of patients who would like to have their teeth bleached.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorPersonalityAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonality InventoryTooth BleachingExtroversionNEO-FFIPersonalityTeeth bleaching

Identifiers

PMID26750134
OpenAlexW2236423216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.