Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26750085›Full record

Trial reportAIDS research and human retroviruses2016

Comparison of Follicular and Luteal Phase Mucosal Markers of HIV Susceptibility in Healthy Women.

Andrea Ries Thurman, Neelima Chandra, Nazita Yousefieh, Irina Zalenskaya, Thomas Kimble, Susana Asin, Christiane Rollenhagen, Sharon M Anderson, Betsy Herold, Pedro M M Mesquita and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Analytical Advances in the Ex Vivo Challenge Efficacy Assay.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2017
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Ries Thurman1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Neelima Chandra1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Nazita Yousefieh1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Irina Zalenskaya1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Thomas Kimble1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Susana Asin2 V.A. Medical Center, White River Junction VT and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Dartmouth, New Hampshire.
Christiane Rollenhagen2 V.A. Medical Center, White River Junction VT and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Dartmouth, New Hampshire.
Sharon M Anderson1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Betsy Herold3 Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, New York.
Pedro M M Mesquita3 Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, New York.
Nicola Richardson-Harman4 Alpha StatConsult , Damascus, Maryland.
Tina Cunningham5 School of Public Health, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Jill L Schwartz1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Gustavo F Doncel1 CONRAD, Eastern Virginia Medical School , Norfolk, Virginia.
Eastern Virginia Medical School · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Differential HIV infection and tenofovir activity in pre and postmenopausal womenR01HD072705 · NICHD · EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DONCEL, GUSTAVO F. · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in vaginal immune cell populations, vaginal tissue gene expression, antimicrobial activity of the cervicovaginal (CV) lavage (CVL), vaginal flora, and p24 antigen production from CV tissues after ex vivo human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection between follicular (FOL) and luteal (LUT) phases of the menstrual cycle. CV tissue biopsies, CV secretions, and blood samples were obtained as part of two longitudinal clinical trials of healthy women (CONRAD D11-119 and A12-124 studies). Participants (n = 39) were HIV-seronegative women not using exogenous hormone supplementation, with normal menstrual cycles, who were screened to exclude sexually transmitted and reproductive tract infections. Serum levels of estradiol and progesterone were significantly higher in the LUT versus the FOL phase of the menstrual cycle. Controlling for race, reported contraceptive use/sexual practices, and clinical trial, we found no differences in vaginal tissue immune cell populations and activation status, transcriptomes, inhibition of HIV, herpes simplex virus type 2 and Escherichia coli by the CVL, vaginal pH or Nugent score, or production of p24 antigen after ex vivo infection by HIV-1BaL between CV samples obtained in the FOL phase versus the LUT phase of the menstrual cycle. There were no significant correlations between serum estradiol and progesterone levels and CV endpoints. The hypothesis that the LUT phase of the menstrual cycle represents a more vulnerable stage for mucosal infection with HIV was not supported by data from samples obtained from the lower genital tract (ectocervix and vagina) from these two clinical trials.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityAdultBiopsyBlood Chemical AnalysisBodily SecretionsEscherichia coliFemaleFollicular PhaseHealthy VolunteersHerpesvirus 2, HumanHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesLuteal PhaseMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID26750085
PMCPMC4892231
OpenAlexW2230897456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.