Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26749590›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2016

Crop acquisition of phosphorus, iron and zinc from soil in cereal/legume intercropping systems: a critical review.

Yanfang Xue, Haiyong Xia, Peter Christie, Zheng Zhang, Long Li, Caixian Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Biofortification of common bean (Food and energy security · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yanfang XueNational Engineering Laboratory for Wheat and Maize, Maize Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China.
Haiyong XiaNational Engineering Laboratory for Wheat and Maize, Maize Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China, drhaiyongxia@gmail.com C.Tang@latrobe.edu.au.
Peter ChristieMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Plant and Soil Interactions, Center for Resources, Environment and Food Security, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China and.
Zheng ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology, Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China.
Long LiMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Plant and Soil Interactions, Center for Resources, Environment and Food Security, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China and.
Caixian TangDepartment of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, Centre for AgriBiosciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne Campus, Bundoora Vic 3086, Australia drhaiyongxia@gmail.com C.Tang@latrobe.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhosphorus (P), iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) are essential elements for plant growth and development, but their availability in soil is often limited. Intercropping contributes to increased P, Fe and Zn uptake and thereby increases yield and improves grain nutritional quality and ultimately human health. A better understanding of how intercropping leads to increased plant P, Fe and Zn availability will help to improve P-fertilizer-use efficiency and agronomic Fe and Zn biofortification. SCOPE: This review synthesizes the literature on how intercropping of legumes with cereals increases acquisition of P, Fe and Zn from soil and recapitulates what is known about root-to-shoot nutrient translocation, plant-internal nutrient remobilization and allocation to grains.

conclusionsDirect interspecific facilitation in intercropping involves below-ground processes in which cereals increase Fe and Zn bioavailability while companion legumes benefit. This has been demonstrated and verified using isotopic nutrient tracing and molecular analysis. The same methodological approaches and field studies should be used to explore direct interspecific P facilitation. Both niche complementarity and interspecific facilitation contribute to increased P acquisition in intercropping. Niche complementarity may also contribute to increased Fe and Zn acquisition, an aspect poorly understood. Interspecific mobilization and uptake facilitation of sparingly soluble P, Fe and Zn from soil, however, are not the only determinants of the concentrations of P, Fe and Zn in grains. Grain yield and nutrient translocation from roots to shoots further influence the concentrations of these nutrients in grains.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalFabaceaeIronPhosphorusSoilZincIronPhosphorusSoilZincBiofortificationcerealsintercroppinginterspecific facilitationlegumesmicronutrientsniche complementarityphosphorusrhizosphereroot architectureroot exudatessoil microbes.

Identifiers

PMID26749590
PMCPMC4765540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.