Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26749587›Full record

SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2016

Gene expression classifier for the diagnosis of indeterminate thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.

Prasanna Santhanam, Rodhan Khthir, Todd Gress, Ayman Elkadry, Omolola Olajide, Abid Yaqub, Henry Driscoll

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evaluation of PACE4 isoforms as biomarkers in thyroid cancer.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Biologic and Clinical Perspectives on Thyroid Cancer.The New England journal of medicine · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Prasanna SanthanamSection of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Byrd Clinical Center, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, 1249 15th Street, Suite 3046, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA. prasanna@marshall.edu.
Rodhan KhthirSection of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Byrd Clinical Center, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, 1249 15th Street, Suite 3046, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA.
Todd GressDepartment of Clinical and Translational Sciences and Department of Internal Medicine, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA.
Ayman ElkadrySection of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Byrd Clinical Center, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, 1249 15th Street, Suite 3046, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA.
Omolola OlajideSection of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Byrd Clinical Center, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, 1249 15th Street, Suite 3046, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA.
Abid YaqubDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Henry DriscollSection of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Byrd Clinical Center, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, 1249 15th Street, Suite 3046, Huntington, WV, 25701, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies demonstrate that a novel genomic test, the gene expression classifier (GEC), could identify a benign gene expression signature in those nodules with indeterminate cytology with a negative predictive value of greater than 95 %. Examine the performance of the AFIRMA gene expression classifier in predicting benign and malignant nodules in patients with cytologically indeterminate nodules. MEDLINE and EMBASE search for studies meeting eligibility criteria between January 1, 2005, and August 30, 2015. A total of 58 studies identified. After excluding duplicates, case reports, reviews, commentary, insufficient data, a total of seven studies selected for analysis. We combined individual patient data from seven studies that examined the GEC test for indeterminate thyroid nodules. The reference standard for determination of benign or malignant nodules was the histopathology of the thyroidectomy specimen. A QUADAS-2 report for all studies included in the final analysis was tabulated for risk of bias and applicability. The pooled sensitivity of the GEC was 95.7 % (95 % CI 92.2-97.9, I (2) value 45.4 %, p = 0.09), and the pooled specificity was 30.5 % (95 % CI 26.0-35.3, I (2) value 92.1 %, p < 0.01). Overall, the diagnostic odds ratio was 7.9 (95 % CI 4.1-15.1). Patients with benign GEC were not followed long enough to ascertain the actual false-negative rates of the index test. Our meta-analysis revealed a high pooled sensitivity and a low specificity for the AFIRMA-GEC test for indeterminate thyroid nodules. This makes it an excellent tool to rule out malignancy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansSensitivity and SpecificityThyroidectomyThyroid NoduleGene expression classifierThyroid nodules

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.