Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26749410›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2016

Small Bowel Limb Lengths and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review.

Kamal K Mahawar, Parveen Kumar, Chetan Parmar, Yitka Graham, William R J Carr, Neil Jennings, Norbert Schroeder, Shlok Balupuri, Peter K Small

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kamal K MahawarBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK. kamal_mahawar@hotmail.com.
Parveen KumarDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.
Chetan ParmarBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Yitka GrahamBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
William R J CarrBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Neil JenningsBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Norbert SchroederBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Shlok BalupuriBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.
Peter K SmallBariatric Unit, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no consensus on the combined length of small bowel that should be bypassed as biliopancreatic or alimentary limb for optimum results with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A number of different limb lengths exist, and there is significant variation in practice amongst surgeons. Inevitably, this means that some patients have too much small bowel bypassed and end up with malnutrition and others end up with a less effective operation. Lack of standardisation poses further problems with interpretation and comparison of scientific literature. This systematic review concludes that a range of 100-200 cm for combined length of biliopancreatic or alimentary limb gives optimum results with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in most patients.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassHumansIntestine, SmallObesity, MorbidTreatment OutcomeWeight LossAlimentary limbBariatric surgeryBiliopancreatic limbGastric bypassObesityRoux-en-Y gastric bypassRoux limbSmall bowel lengthSmall bowel limb length

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.