Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26749312›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2016

How Accurate is Your Sclerostin Measurement? Comparison Between Three Commercially Available Sclerostin ELISA Kits.

Isabelle Piec, Christopher Washbourne, Jonathan Tang, Emily Fisher, Julie Greeves, Sarah Jackson, William D Fraser

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gender-Affirming Hormone Treatment Decreases Bone Turnover in Transwomen and Older Transmen.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sclerostin: From Molecule to Clinical Biomarker.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Sclerostin in Bone and Ectopic Calcification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Sclerostin: a new biomarker of CKD-MBD.International urology and nephrology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. FGF23-klotho axis, bone fractures, and arterial stiffness in dialysis: a case-control study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. 24-hour profile of serum sclerostin and its association with bone biomarkers in men.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle PiecBioanalytical Facility, University of East Anglia, Floor 2, Bob Champion Research and Education Building, Norwich Research Park, James Watson Road, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK. i.piec@uea.ac.uk.
Christopher WashbourneBioanalytical Facility, University of East Anglia, Floor 2, Bob Champion Research and Education Building, Norwich Research Park, James Watson Road, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Jonathan TangBioanalytical Facility, University of East Anglia, Floor 2, Bob Champion Research and Education Building, Norwich Research Park, James Watson Road, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Emily FisherBioanalytical Facility, University of East Anglia, Floor 2, Bob Champion Research and Education Building, Norwich Research Park, James Watson Road, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Julie GreevesWomen Ground Close Combat Review, Directorate of Manning (Army), Blenheim Bld, IDL 27, Monxton Road, Andover, SP11 8HT, UK.
Sarah JacksonWomen Ground Close Combat Review, Directorate of Manning (Army), Blenheim Bld, IDL 27, Monxton Road, Andover, SP11 8HT, UK.
William D FraserBioanalytical Facility, University of East Anglia, Floor 2, Bob Champion Research and Education Building, Norwich Research Park, James Watson Road, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
University of East Anglia · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBNorwich Research Park · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sclerostin, bone formation antagonist is in the spotlight as a potential biomarker for diseases presenting with associated bone disorders such as chronic kidney disease (CDK-MBD). Accurate measurement of sclerostin is therefore important. Several immunoassays are available to measure sclerostin in serum and plasma. We compared the performance of three commercial ELISA kits. We measured sclerostin concentrations in serum and EDTA plasma obtained from healthy young (18-26 years) human subjects using kits from Biomedica, TECOmedical and from R&D Systems. The circulating sclerostin concentrations were systematically higher when measured with the Biomedica assay (serum: 35.5 ± 1.1 pmol/L; EDTA: 39.4 ± 2.0 pmol/L; mean ± SD) as compared with TECOmedical (serum: 21.8 ± 0.7 pmol/L; EDTA: 27.2 ± 1.3 pmol/L) and R&D Systems (serum: 7.6 ± 0.3 pmol/L; EDTA: 30.9 ± 1.5 pmol/L). We found a good correlation between the assay for EDTA plasma (r > 0.6; p < 0.001) while in serum, only measurements obtained using TECOmedical and R&D Systems assays correlated significantly (r = 0.78; p < 0.001). There was no correlation between matrices results when using the Biomedica kit (r = 0.20). The variability in values generated from Biomedica, R&D Systems and TECOmedical assays raises questions regarding the accuracy and specificity of the assays. Direct comparison of studies using different kits is not possible and great care should be given to measurement of sclerostin, with traceability of reagents. Standardization with appropriate material is required before different sclerostin assays can be introduced in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdolescentAdultBiomarkersBone Morphogenetic ProteinsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGenetic MarkersHumansReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkersBone Morphogenetic ProteinsGenetic MarkersReagent Kits, DiagnosticSOST protein, humanClinical utilityELISAMetabolic bone diseaseSclerostin

Identifiers

PMID26749312
PMCPMC4860200
OpenAlexW187326022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.