Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26749003›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2016

Brain structure-function associations identified in large-scale neuroimaging data.

Zhi Yang, Jiang Qiu, Peipei Wang, Rui Liu, Xi-Nian Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MR Imaging of SCA3/MJD.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhi YangKey Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Laboratory for Functional Connectome and Development and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China. yangz@psych.ac.cn.
Jiang QiuFaculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Peipei WangBeijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Rui LiuKey Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Laboratory for Functional Connectome and Development and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Xi-Nian ZuoKey Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Laboratory for Functional Connectome and Development and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research Center, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China. zuoxn@psych.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-585X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationships between structural and functional measures of the human brain remain largely unknown. A majority of our limited knowledge regarding structure-function associations has been obtained through comparisons between specific groups of patients and healthy controls. Unfortunately, a direct and complete view of the associations across multiple structural and functional metrics in normal population is missing. We filled this gap by learning cross-individual co-variance among structural and functional measures using large-scale neuroimaging datasets. A discover-confirm scheme was applied to two independent samples (N = 184 and N = 340) of multi-modal neuroimaging datasets. A data mining tool, gRAICAR, was employed in the discover stage to generate quantitative and unbiased hypotheses of the co-variance among six functional and six structural imaging metrics. These hypotheses were validated using an independent dataset in the confirm stage. Fifteen multi-metric co-variance units, representing different co-variance relationships among the 12 metrics, were reliable across the two sets of neuroimaging datasets. The reliable co-variance units were summarized into a database, where users can select any location on the cortical map of any metric to examine the co-varying maps with the other 11 metrics. This database characterized the six functional metrics based on their co-variance with structural metrics, and provided a detailed reference to connect previous findings using different metrics and to predict maps of unexamined metrics. Gender, age, and handedness were associated to the co-variance units, and a sub-study of schizophrenia demonstrated the usefulness of the co-variance database.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainConnectomeDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingReproducibility of ResultsSchizophreniaYoung AdultConnectomicsData miningIndependent component analysisMulti-modal integrationStructure–function association

Identifiers

PMID26749003
PMCPMC5102954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.