Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26748662›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2016

Statistical efficiency and optimal design for stepped cluster studies under linear mixed effects models.

Alan J Girling, Karla Hemming

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03243396 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Building and Sustaining Interventions for Children (BASIC): Task-sharing Mental Health Care in Low-resource Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2018 to 2024Enrolled956ConditionsGrief, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, DepressionArmsTrauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
NCT06736730 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Proposal to Establish the Mississippi Violence Injury Prevention (VIP) Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterRan2025 to 2028Enrolled500ConditionsGun Shot WoundArmsHospital-Linked Violence Intervention Program, Mobile Community Event Support, Unrestricted Cash Assistance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alan J GirlingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, U.K.
Karla HemmingInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, U.K.

Funding

Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1Medical Research Council G0800808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In stepped cluster designs the intervention is introduced into some (or all) clusters at different times and persists until the end of the study. Instances include traditional parallel cluster designs and the more recent stepped-wedge designs. We consider the precision offered by such designs under mixed-effects models with fixed time and random subject and cluster effects (including interactions with time), and explore the optimal choice of uptake times. The results apply both to cross-sectional studies where new subjects are observed at each time-point, and longitudinal studies with repeat observations on the same subjects. The efficiency of the design is expressed in terms of a 'cluster-mean correlation' which carries information about the dependency-structure of the data, and two design coefficients which reflect the pattern of uptake-times. In cross-sectional studies the cluster-mean correlation combines information about the cluster-size and the intra-cluster correlation coefficient. A formula is given for the 'design effect' in both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. An algorithm for optimising the choice of uptake times is described and specific results obtained for the best balanced stepped designs. In large studies we show that the best design is a hybrid mixture of parallel and stepped-wedge components, with the proportion of stepped wedge clusters equal to the cluster-mean correlation. The impact of prior uncertainty in the cluster-mean correlation is considered by simulation. Some specific hybrid designs are proposed for consideration when the cluster-mean correlation cannot be reliably estimated, using a minimax principle to ensure acceptable performance across the whole range of unknown values. © 2016 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisLinear ModelsStatistics as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, StatisticalTime Factorscluster studiesintra-cluster correlationoptimal designstepped-wedge designs

Identifiers

PMID26748662
PMCPMC4949721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.