Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26747792›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2016

Factors Associated With Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in the Medical Group of the SAMMPRIS Trial.

Michael F Waters, Brian L Hoh, Michael J Lynn, Hyung-Min Kwon, Tanya N Turan, Colin P Derdeyn, David Fiorella, Anna Khanna, Tiffany O Sheehan, Bethany F Lane and 4 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00576693 phase3completednot on this map

Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2008 to 2013Enrolled451ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsintracranial angioplasty and stenting, intensive medical management
NCT05270746 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Predictive Value of Retinal Vascular Signs for Patients With Intracranial Artery Stenosis: A Prospective, Continuity Study, Cross-sectional Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCapital Medical UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled1,000ConditionsIntracranial Stenosis
NCT05907629 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Anti-coagulation and Anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis- Magnetic Resonance Imaging

TypeobservationalSponsorYale UniversityRan2024 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsStroke, Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis (ICAS)ArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael F WatersDepartment of Neurology, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville2Department of Neuroscience, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
Brian L HohDepartment of Neurosurgery, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
Michael J LynnDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Hyung-Min KwonDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston6Department of Neurology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Tanya N TuranDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Colin P DerdeynMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
David FiorellaDepartment of Neurosurgery, State University of New York, Stony Brook.
Anna KhannaDepartment of Neurology, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
Tiffany O SheehanDepartment of Neurology, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville.
Bethany F LaneDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Scott JanisNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jean MontgomeryDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia.
Marc I ChimowitzDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial Investigators
Emory University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Florida · USFlorida College · USMallinckrodt (United States) · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · USState University of New York · US

Funding

UCSF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR024131 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$111.2M
Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
SAMMPRIS (Stenting vs. Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing . . .U01NS058728 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CHIMOWITZ, MARC IVOR · 2008 to 2011
$20.0M
UF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARDUL1RR029890 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2009 to 2011
$14.4M
SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardTL1RR029889 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2009 to 2011
$498k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR029889NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024131NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024131NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029882NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029889NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029890NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR029890NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS058728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial showed that aggressive medical therapy was more effective than stenting for preventing stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. However, 15% of patients in the medical group still experienced a primary end point during a median follow-up of 32.7 months.

objectiveTo determine baseline features that were associated with a high rate of a primary end point in the medical arm of the SAMMPRIS Trial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA post hoc analysis of patients in the medical arm only of the SAMMPRIS trial. Enrollment occurred between October 2008 and April 2013 and included 227 patients randomized to medical management alone. Baseline demographic features, vascular risk factors, qualifying event, brain imaging, and angiographic features were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariable proportional hazard regression modeling was performed to relate baseline features to the time until a primary end point. The post hoc analysis was conducted from November 2014 to June 2015.

interventionsThe SAMMPRIS Trial compared stenting with aggressive medical management in patients with a stroke or transient ischemic attack attributed to 70% to 99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was any of the following: stroke or death within 30 days of enrollment, ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery beyond 30 days after enrollment, or any stroke or death within 30 days after stenting a patient in the medical group during follow-up.

resultsA total of 227 patients were included in the study, 82 of whom were female, and the mean (SD) age was 59.5 (11.8) years. Being female (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% CI, 0.96-3.7), having diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9-3.5), not taking a statin at enrollment (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.7), stroke as the qualifying event (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.03-6.0), Rankin grade of 1 or greater (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.9-5.5), old infarct in the territory of the stenotic artery (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.1), and greater than 80% stenosis (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9-3.7) were associated (P < .10) with higher risk on bivariate analysis. Factors that were significantly associated with a primary end point on multivariable analyses were old infarct in the territory (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.3; P = .006), stroke as the qualifying event (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-7.7; P = .03), and no statin use at enrollment (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.2; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Old infarct in the territory of the stenosis, new stroke presentation, and absence of statin use at enrollment were independently associated with high rates of the primary end point in the medical group in the SAMMPRIS Trial. These features may be useful for selecting high-risk patients for future clinical trials evaluating alternative therapies for intracranial stenosis.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00576693.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAgedBrain IschemiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRisk FactorsSex FactorsStroke

Identifiers

PMID26747792
PMCPMC5576955
OpenAlexW2208310478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.