Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26747748›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

The role of blood vessels in high-resolution volume conductor head modeling of EEG.

L D J Fiederer, J Vorwerk, F Lucka, M Dannhauer, S Yang, M Dümpelmann, A Schulze-Bonhage, A Aertsen, O Speck, C H Wolters and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Source localization of epileptic spikes using Multiple Sparse Priors.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Numerical Techniques for Solving the Current Injection Problem in Biological Tissues.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

L D J FiedererIntracranial EEG and Brain Imaging Lab, Epilepsy Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany; Neurobiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany. Electronic address: lukas.fiederer@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
J VorwerkInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Germany.
F LuckaInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Germany; Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics, University of Münster, Germany; Department of Computer Science, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, UK.
M DannhauerScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, 72 So. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA; Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing, University of Utah, 72 S. Central Campus Drive, 84112, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
S YangDept. of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany.
M DümpelmannIntracranial EEG and Brain Imaging Lab, Epilepsy Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany.
A Schulze-BonhageBrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany.
A AertsenNeurobiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Germany; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany.
O SpeckDept. of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany.
C H WoltersInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Münster, Germany.
T BallIntracranial EEG and Brain Imaging Lab, Epilepsy Center, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany; BrainLinks-BrainTools Cluster of Excellence, University of Freiburg, Germany; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JURRUS, ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstruction of the electrical sources of human EEG activity at high spatio-temporal accuracy is an important aim in neuroscience and neurological diagnostics. Over the last decades, numerous studies have demonstrated that realistic modeling of head anatomy improves the accuracy of source reconstruction of EEG signals. For example, including a cerebro-spinal fluid compartment and the anisotropy of white matter electrical conductivity were both shown to significantly reduce modeling errors. Here, we for the first time quantify the role of detailed reconstructions of the cerebral blood vessels in volume conductor head modeling for EEG. To study the role of the highly arborized cerebral blood vessels, we created a submillimeter head model based on ultra-high-field-strength (7T) structural MRI datasets. Blood vessels (arteries and emissary/intraosseous veins) were segmented using Frangi multi-scale vesselness filtering. The final head model consisted of a geometry-adapted cubic mesh with over 17×10(6) nodes. We solved the forward model using a finite-element-method (FEM) transfer matrix approach, which allowed reducing computation times substantially and quantified the importance of the blood vessel compartment by computing forward and inverse errors resulting from ignoring the blood vessels. Our results show that ignoring emissary veins piercing the skull leads to focal localization errors of approx. 5 to 15mm. Large errors (>2cm) were observed due to the carotid arteries and the dense arterial vasculature in areas such as in the insula or in the medial temporal lobe. Thus, in such predisposed areas, errors caused by neglecting blood vessels can reach similar magnitudes as those previously reported for neglecting white matter anisotropy, the CSF or the dura - structures which are generally considered important components of realistic EEG head models. Our findings thus imply that including a realistic blood vessel compartment in EEG head models will be helpful to improve the accuracy of EEG source analyses particularly when high accuracies in brain areas with dense vasculature are required.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationElectroencephalographyModels, AnatomicBrainFinite Element AnalysisHeadHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, Neurological7T MRIBlood vessel modelingEEG source localizationExtended source modelFEMForward problemInverse problemSubmillimeter volume conductor head model

Identifiers

PMID26747748
PMCPMC5225375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.