Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26747416›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2016

Moderators and mediators of the relationship between receiving versus being denied a pregnancy termination and subsequent binge drinking.

S C M Roberts, M S Subbaraman, K L Delucchi, S C Wilsnack, D G Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S C M RobertsAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94706, USA. Electronic address: sarah.roberts@ucsf.edu.
M S SubbaramanAlcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. Electronic address: msubbaraman@arg.org.
K L DelucchiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, Box 0984 TRC, 401 Parnassus Avenue, Langley Porter Room 379, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Electronic address: kevin.delucchi@ucsf.edu.
S C WilsnackDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, 501 North Columbia Road Stop 9037, Grand Forks, ND 58202-9037, USA. Electronic address: sharon.wilsnack@med.und.edu.
D G FosterAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1100, Oakland, CA 94706, USA. Electronic address: diana.greenefoster@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USPublic Health Institute · USUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

Alcohol consumption before, during, and after unwanted pregnancyR21AA021440 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROBERTS, SARAH C.M. · 2013 to 2014
$319k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA021440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen who terminate pregnancies drink more subsequent to the pregnancy than women who give birth, including women who give birth after seeking to terminate a pregnancy.

methodsData are from the Turnaway Study, a prospective, longitudinal study of 956 women who sought to terminate pregnancies at 30 U.S. facilities. This paper focuses on the 452 women who received terminations just below facility gestational limits and 231 who were denied terminations because they presented just beyond facility gestational limits. This study examined whether baseline characteristics moderate the relationship between termination and subsequent binge drinking and whether stress, feelings about the pregnancy, and number of social roles mediate the relationship.

resultsOnly having had a previous live birth modified the termination-binge drinking relationship. Among women with previous live births, binge drinking was reduced among women carrying to term compared to terminating the pregnancy. Among women who had not had a previous live birth, however, the reduction in binge drinking among those denied termination was not sustained over time, and binge drinking of those who had and had not had terminations converged by 2.5 years. Neither stress, negative emotions, nor social roles mediated effects on binge drinking. Positive emotions at one week mediated effects on binge drinking at six months, although positive emotions at two years did not mediate effects on binge drinking at 2.5 years.

conclusionsHigher levels of binge drinking among those who terminate pregnancies do not appear due to stress or to negative emotions. Only parous women - and not nulliparous women - denied terminations experienced sustained reductions in binge drinking over time.

Indexed as

Abortion, LegalAdolescentAdultBinge DrinkingEmotionsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsUnited StatesYoung AdultAlcoholParentingPregnancyPregnancy termination

Identifiers

PMID26747416
PMCPMC4724544
OpenAlexW2190613114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.