Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26747203›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016

A Computational Approach to Estimating Nondisjunction Frequency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Daniel B Chu, Sean M Burgess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mathematical modeling of human oocyte aneuploidy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel B ChuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616.
Sean M BurgessDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, California 95616 smburgess@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-0084
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Homologous Chromosome Pairing in MeiosisR01GM075119 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BURGESS, SEAN M · 2006 to 2020
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075119NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM075119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Errors segregating homologous chromosomes during meiosis result in aneuploid gametes and are the largest contributing factor to birth defects and spontaneous abortions in humans. Saccharomyces cerevisiae has long served as a model organism for studying the gene network supporting normal chromosome segregation. Measuring homolog nondisjunction frequencies is laborious, and involves dissecting thousands of tetrads to detect missegregation of individually marked chromosomes. Here we describe a computational method (TetFit) to estimate the relative contributions of meiosis I nondisjunction and random-spore death to spore inviability in wild type and mutant strains. These values are based on finding the best-fit distribution of 4, 3, 2, 1, and 0 viable-spore tetrads to an observed distribution. Using TetFit, we found that meiosis I nondisjunction is an intrinsic component of spore inviability in wild-type strains. We show proof-of-principle that the calculated average meiosis I nondisjunction frequency determined by TetFit closely matches empirically determined values in mutant strains. Using these published data sets, TetFit uncovered two classes of mutants: Class A mutants skew toward increased nondisjunction death, and include those with known defects in establishing pairing, recombination, and/or synapsis of homologous chromosomes. Class B mutants skew toward random spore death, and include those with defects in sister-chromatid cohesion and centromere function. Epistasis analysis using TetFit is facilitated by the low numbers of tetrads (as few as 200) required to compare the contributions to spore death in different mutant backgrounds. TetFit analysis does not require any special strain construction, and can be applied to previously observed tetrad distributions.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, FungalComputational BiologyModels, GeneticNondisjunction, GeneticAlgorithmsGenes, FungalMeiosisMicrobial ViabilityMutationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpores, Fungalbudding yeastmeiosisnondisjunctionprecocious sister chromatid separationtetrad analysis

Identifiers

PMID26747203
PMCPMC4777129
OpenAlexW2949652137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.