Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26747050›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology international2016

The efficacy and safety of low-dose radiotherapy on pain and functioning in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

M J M Minten, E Mahler, A A den Broeder, J W H Leer, C H van den Ende

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04424628 (Three vs Six Gy in Gonarthrosis and Coxarthrosis. Non Inferiority Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04424628 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Three vs Six Gy in Gonarthrosis and Coxarthrosis. Non Inferiority Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion GenesisCareRan2019 to 2023Enrolled338ConditionsGonarthrosis, CoxarthrosisArmsLow dose radiotherapy A, Low dose radiotherapy B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiotherapy for osteoarthritis-an analysis of 295 joints treated with a linear accelerator.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  10. Radiotherapy for osteoarthritis of the ankle and tarsal joints-analysis of 66 joints.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Re-irradiation for osteoarthritis-retrospective analysis of 217 joints.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M J M MintenDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.minten@maartenskliniek.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-9431
E MahlerDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A A den BroederDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J W H LeerDepartment of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
C H van den EndeDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sint Maartenskliniek · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-dose radiotherapy (LD-RT) has been widely used for treatment of non-malignant disorders since its introduction and animal studies show anti-inflammatory effects in osteoarthritis (OA). However, the evidence for its effect in clinical practice remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is to systematically summarise the literature on effectiveness of LD-RT on pain and functioning in patients with OA and its safety. Broad search terms were used to search PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Primary inclusion criteria were osteoarthritis as indication, radiotherapy as intervention, written in English, German or Dutch and published since 1980. Study quality was assessed using the EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (scale: strong, moderate, weak). Seven studies were suitable for inclusion, all with retrospective uncontrolled observational design. Methodological quality of all studies was judged as weak. Most studies used 2-3 RT sessions per week for 2 weeks, some with booster session after 6 weeks. Generally, non-validated single-item measurement instruments were used to evaluate the effect of LD-RT on pain and function. Across the studies, in 25-90 and 29-71 % of the patients pain and functioning improved, respectively. Side effects were described in one study, none were reported. Our results show that there is insufficient evidence for efficacy or to confirm the safety of LD-RT in treatment of OA, due to absence of high-quality studies. Therefore, a well-designed, sham-controlled and blinded randomised trial, using validated outcome measures is warranted to demonstrate the value of LD-RT for OA in clinical practice.

Indexed as

HumansOsteoarthritisPainRadiotherapyRadiotherapy DosageTreatment OutcomeFunctioningOsteoarthritisPainRadiotherapySafetySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26747050
OpenAlexW1071505693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.