Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26747045›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2016

Fine genetic mapping of spot blotch resistance gene Sb3 in wheat (Triticum aestivum).

Ping Lu, Yong Liang, Delin Li, Zhengzhong Wang, Wenbin Li, Guoxin Wang, Yong Wang, Shenghui Zhou, Qiuhong Wu, Jingzhong Xie and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Two independent dominant resistance genes confer resistance to spot blotch in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Genome wide association studies and expression analyses identify candidate genes for spot blotch resistance in bread wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Wheat TaNADPO Promotes Spot Blotch Resistance.Molecular plant pathology · 2025
    Article
  6. Transcriptome analyses revealPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  7. High-density mapping of durable and broad-spectrum stripe rust resistance gene Yr30 in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Meta-QTL analysis in wheat: progress, challenges and opportunities.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fine mapping of QPm.caas-3BS, a stable QTL for adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  19. Enhanced stripe rust resistance obtained by combining Yr30 with a widely dispersed, consistent QTL on chromosome arm 4BL.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ping LuState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yong LiangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Delin LiState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhengzhong WangChina Rural Technology Development Center, Beijing, 100045, China.
Wenbin LiState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Guoxin WangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yong WangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Shenghui ZhouState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qiuhong WuState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jingzhong XieState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Deyun ZhangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yongxing ChenState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Miaomiao LiState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yan ZhangState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Qixin SunState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chenggui HanState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhiyong LiuState Key Laboratory for Agrobiotechnology/Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. zhiyongliu@cau.edu.cn.
China Agricultural University · CNChina Rural Technology Development Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageSpot blotch disease resistance gene Sb3 was mapped to a 0.15 centimorgan (cM) genetic interval spanning a 602 kb physical genomic region on chromosome 3BS. Wheat spot blotch disease, caused by B. sorokiniana, is a devastating disease that can cause severe yield losses. Although inoculum levels can be reduced by planting disease-free seed, treatment of plants with fungicides and crop rotation, genetic resistance is likely to be a robust, economical and environmentally friendly tool in the control of spot blotch. The winter wheat line 621-7-1 confers immune resistance against B. sorokiniana. Genetic analysis indicates that the spot blotch resistance of 621-7-1 is controlled by a single dominant gene, provisionally designated Sb3. Bulked segregant analysis (BSA) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) mapping showed that Sb3 is located on chromosome arm 3BS linked with markers Xbarc133 and Xbarc147. Seven and twelve new polymorphic markers were developed from the Chinese Spring 3BS shotgun survey sequence contigs and 3BS reference sequences, respectively. Finally, Sb3 was mapped in a 0.15 cM genetic interval spanning a 602 kb physical genomic region of Chinese Spring chromosome 3BS. The genetic and physical maps of Sb3 provide a framework for map-based cloning and marker-assisted selection (MAS) of the spot blotch resistance.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingAscomycotaChromosomes, PlantDisease ResistanceGenes, DominantGenes, PlantGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersMicrosatellite RepeatsPhysical Chromosome MappingPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID26747045
OpenAlexW2227103820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.