Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26746876›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Efficacy of the Lunch is in the Bag intervention to increase parents' packing of healthy bag lunches for young children: a cluster-randomized trial in early care and education centers.

Cindy Roberts-Gray, Margaret E Briley, Nalini Ranjit, Courtney E Byrd-Williams, Sara J Sweitzer, Shreela V Sharma, Maria Romo Palafox, Deanna M Hoelscher

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01292434 (Lunch in the Bag), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01292434 nacompletednot on this map

Lunch in the Bag: Packing More Fruit, Vegetables, Grain in Preschool Sack Lunches

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2008 to 2013Enrolled1,266ConditionsDietary BehaviorArmsLunch is in the Bag behavioral intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cindy Roberts-GrayThird Coast R & D, Inc., 2728 Avenue Q, Galveston, TX, 77550, USA. croberts@thirdcoastresearch.com.
Margaret E BrileyNutritional Sciences, School of Human Ecology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX, 78746, USA. m.briley@austin.utexas.edu.
Nalini RanjitHealth Promotion/Behavioral Sciences, Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas School of Public Health Austin Regional Campus, 1616 Guadalupe Street, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX, 78701, USA. Nalini.Ranjit@uth.tmc.edu.
Courtney E Byrd-WilliamsHealth Promotion/Behavioral Sciences, Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas School of Public Health Austin Regional Campus, 1616 Guadalupe Street, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX, 78701, USA. courtney.e.byrdwilliams@uth.tmc.edu.
Sara J SweitzerNutritional Sciences, School of Human Ecology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX, 78746, USA. sjsweitz@mail.utexas.edu.
Shreela V SharmaEpidemiology, University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Hermann Pressler Lane, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Shreela.V.Sharma@uth.tmc.edu.
Maria Romo PalafoxNutritional Sciences, School of Human Ecology, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX, 78746, USA. majorromo@gmail.com.
Deanna M HoelscherHealth Promotion/Behavioral Sciences, Michael & Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, University of Texas School of Public Health Austin Regional Campus, 1616 Guadalupe Street, Suite 6.300, Austin, TX, 78701, USA. Deanna.M.Hoelscher@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EDUCATION--CANCER PREVENTION/CONTROLR25CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MULLEN, PATRICIA DOLAN · 1992 to 2017
$8.6M
Lunch in the Bag: Packing More Fruit, Vegetables, Grain in Preschool Sack LunchesR01CA149643 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HOELSCHER, DEANNA MARIE · 2010 to 2013
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS 2 R25 CA57712NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149643NCI NIH HHS R01CA149643NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLunches that parents pack for their young children to eat at school or the Early Care and Education (ECE) center fall short of recommended standards. Lunch is in the Bag is a multi-level behavioral nutrition intervention to increase parents' packing of fruit, vegetables, and whole grains in their children's lunches. Designed for implementation in ECE centers, the five-week long intervention is followed three months later with a one-week booster.

methodsEfficacy of Lunch is in the Bag was tested in cluster randomized trial. Participants were 633 families from 30 ECE centers (15 intervention, 15 control) across Austin, San Antonio, and Houston, Texas, USA. Primary outcomes were servings of fruit, vegetables, and whole grains observed in the children's parent-packed bag lunches. Servings of refined grains, meats/beans/eggs/nuts, dairy, chips, and sweets also were observed. Data were collected at baseline, post-intervention (6-week follow-up), pre-booster (22-weeks follow-up), and post-booster (28-week follow-up). Time-by-treatment interactions were analyzed separately for each of the food groups using multi-level models to compare changes from baseline. Analyses were adjusted for relevant demographic variables and clustering within centers and parents.

resultsThe intervention effected increases from baseline to 6-week follow-up in vegetables (0.17 servings, SE = 0.04, P < 0.001) and whole grains (0.30 servings, SE = 0.13, P = 0.018). The increase in whole grains was maintained through the 28-week follow-up (0.34 servings, SE = 0.13, P = 0.009). Fruit averaged more than 1.40 servings with no differences between groups or across time. The intervention prevented increase in sweets (-0.43 servings, SE = 0.11, P < .001, at the 22-week follow-up). Parents persisted, however, in packing small amounts of vegetables (averages of 0.41 to 0.52 servings) and large amounts of sweets and chips (averages of 1.75 to 1.99 servings).

conclusionsThe need for and positive effects of the Lunch is in the Bag intervention at ECE centers where parents send bag lunch for their preschool-aged children was confirmed. An important direction for future research is discovery of more options for leveraging the partnership of ECE centers and families to help young children learn to eat and enjoy vegetables and other healthy foods in preference to less healthy choices such as chips and sweets.

trial registrationThe Clinical Trials Number is NCT01292434 .

Indexed as

LunchChild, PreschoolDietFemaleFruitHumansMaleParentsSchoolsTexasTreatment OutcomeVegetables

Identifiers

PMID26746876
PMCPMC4706656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.