Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26746839›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2016

Loa loa in the vitreous cavity of the eye.

Bhagabat Nayak, Subijay Sinha, Lipika Nayak

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting seasonal infection of eyeworm (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019
    Article
  5. Presence of adultTzu chi medical journal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhagabat NayakDr RP Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2591
Subijay SinhaSushrut Eye Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Lipika NayakLok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2591

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 25-year-old man presented with painful diminution of vision (20/160), accompanied by redness, pain and floaters, over a period of 2 weeks, in his left eye. On examination, the anterior segment revealed moderate inflammation. Posterior segment examination showed a grade one vitreous haze with a fairly long live worm moving around in a haphazard and relentless manner throughout the vitreous cavity. The media was slightly hazy due to corneal oedema. The worm was clearly visible in the fundus photo taken. So we planned the patient for vitrectomy, and removal of the worm was performed under steroid cover. The worm was sent to the microbiology department for examination and it was found to be the species of Loa loa. The patient was administered a course of diethylcarbamazine and, on follow-up after 2 weeks, his vision had improved to 20/40.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsEye Infections, ParasiticHumansLoaLoiasisMaleVitreous Body

Identifiers

PMID26746839
PMCPMC4716388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.