Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26746806›Full record

ReviewTrends in ecology & evolution2016

Complex Homology and the Evolution of Nervous Systems.

Benjamin J Liebeskind, David M Hillis, Harold H Zakon, Hans A Hofmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in ecology & evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Incongruence in the phylogenomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Genome Integrity and Neurological Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Elementary nervous systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Developmental processes in Ediacara macrofossils.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Evolution of neuronal types and families.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2019
    Review
  17. Coherent directed movement toward food modeled inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Conserved transcriptomic profiles underpin monogamy across vertebrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Comparative Principles for Next-Generation Neuroscience.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin J LiebeskindCenter for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712. Electronic address: bliebeskind@austin.utexas.edu.
David M HillisInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Harold H ZakonInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Josephine Bay Paul Center for Comparative Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
Hans A HofmannInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA; Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

Funding

Evolutionary Biophysics of Slo3 Potassium ChannelsF32GM112504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI LIEBESKIND, BENJAMIN J · 2015 to 2017
$163k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM112504-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM112504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine the complex evolution of animal nervous systems and discuss the ramifications of this complexity for inferring the nature of early animals. Although reconstructing the origins of nervous systems remains a central challenge in biology, and the phenotypic complexity of early animals remains controversial, a compelling picture is emerging. We now know that the nervous system and other key animal innovations contain a large degree of homoplasy, at least on the molecular level. Conflicting hypotheses about early nervous system evolution are due primarily to differences in the interpretation of this homoplasy. We highlight the need for explicit discussion of assumptions and discuss the limitations of current approaches for inferring ancient phenotypic states.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansNervous System

Identifiers

PMID26746806
PMCPMC4765321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.