Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26746242›Full record

Trial reportJournal of youth and adolescence2016

Shared Risk Factors for the Perpetration of Physical Dating Violence, Bullying, and Sexual Harassment Among Adolescents Exposed to Domestic Violence.

Vangie A Foshee, H Luz McNaughton Reyes, May S Chen, Susan T Ennett, Kathleen C Basile, Sarah DeGue, Alana M Vivolo-Kantor, Kathryn E Moracco, J Michael Bowling

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The Efficacy of the "Dat-e Adolescence" Prevention Program in the Reduction of Dating Violence and Bullying.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. State-level teen dating violence education laws and teen dating violence victimisation in the USA: a cross-sectional analysis of 36 states.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vangie A FosheeDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 319B Rosenau Hall CB# 7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA. foshee@email.unc.edu.
H Luz McNaughton ReyesDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7440, 319G Rosenau Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. mcnaught@email.unc.edu.
May S ChenDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7400, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. maychen@email.unc.edu.
Susan T EnnettDepartment of Health Behavior, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7440, Rosenau Hall 358A, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA. sennett@email.unc.edu.
Kathleen C BasileDivision of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F64, Atlanta, GA, USA. ksb9@cdc.gov.
Sarah DeGueDivision of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS-64, Atlanta, GA, USA. hci2@cdc.gov.
Alana M Vivolo-KantorDivision of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway MS F-64, Atlanta, GA, USA. goz4@cdc.gov.
Kathryn E MoraccoDepartment of Health Behavior, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7440, 359 Rosenau Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. moracco@email.unc.edu.
J Michael BowlingDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB# 7440, 309 Rosenau Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. jbowling@email.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

A Randomized Efficacy Trial of Moms and Teens for Safe DatesR01CE001867 · CE · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FOSHEE, VANGIE A · 2010 to 2012
$1.2M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE001867NCIPC CDC HHS R01CE001867-01PHS HHS 13IPA1303570PHS HHS 13IPA130569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high risk of perpetrating physical dating violence, bullying, and sexual harassment by adolescents exposed to domestic violence points to the need for programs to prevent these types of aggression among this group. This study of adolescents exposed to domestic violence examined whether these forms of aggression share risk factors that could be targeted for change in single programs designed to prevent all three types of aggression. Analyses were conducted on 399 mother victims of domestic violence and their adolescents, recruited through community advertising. The adolescents ranged in age from 12 to 16 years; 64 % were female. Generalized estimating equations was used to control for the covariation among the aggression types when testing for shared risk factors. Approximately 70 % of the adolescents reported perpetrating at least one of the three forms of aggression. In models examining one risk factor at a time, but controlling for demographics, adolescent acceptance of sexual violence, mother-adolescent discord, family conflict, low maternal monitoring, low mother-adolescent closeness, low family cohesion, depressed affect, feelings of anger, and anger reactivity were shared across all three aggression types. In multivariable models, which included all of the risk factors examined and the demographic variables, low maternal monitoring, depressed affect and anger reactivity remained significant shared risk factors. Our findings suggest that programs targeting these risk factors for change have the potential to prevent all three forms of aggression. In multivariable models, poor conflict management skills was a risk for bullying and sexual harassment, but not dating violence; acceptance of dating violence was a risk for dating violence and bullying, but not sexual harassment; and none of the examined risk factors were unique to aggression type. The study's implications for the development of interventions and future research are discussed.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAggressionBullyingDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleMother-Child RelationsRisk FactorsSex OffensesSexual HarassmentAggression among adolescents exposed to domestic violenceBullyingPhysical dating violenceSexual harassment

Identifiers

PMID26746242
PMCPMC5859571
OpenAlexW2229484539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.