Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26746228›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2016

Physicians' attitudes and knowledge concerning antibiotic prescription and resistance: questionnaire development and reliability.

António Teixeira Rodrigues, Mónica Ferreira, Fátima Roque, Amílcar Falcão, Elmano Ramalheira, Adolfo Figueiras, Maria Teresa Herdeiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

António Teixeira RodriguesDepartment of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal. at.afonso@outlook.com.
Mónica FerreiraDepartment of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal. monica.ferreira@ua.pt.
Fátima RoqueDepartment of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal. froque@ipg.pt.
Amílcar FalcãoFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. acfalcao@ff.uc.pt.
Elmano RamalheiraHospital Infante D. Pedro, EPE, Aveiro, Portugal. elmano.ramalheira@hdaveiro.min-saude.pt.
Adolfo FigueirasUniversity of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. adolfo.figueiras@usc.es.
Maria Teresa HerdeiroDepartment of Medical Sciences and Institute for Biomedicine - iBiMED, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal. teresaherdeiro@ua.pt.
University of Aveiro · PTUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding physicians' antibiotic-prescribing behaviour is fundamental when it comes to improving antibiotic use and tackling the growing rates of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of the study was to develop and validate--in terms of face validity, content validity and reliability--an instrument designed to assess the attitudes and knowledge underlying physician antibiotic prescribing.

methodsThe questionnaire development and validation process comprised two different steps, namely: (1) content and face validation, which included a literature review and validation both by physicians and by Portuguese language and clinical psychology experts; and (2) reliability analysis, using the test-retest method, to assess the questionnaire's internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient--ICC). The questionnaire includes 17 items assessing attitudes and knowledge about antibiotic prescribing and resistances and 9 items evaluating the importance of different sources of knowledge. The study was conducted in the catchment area covered by Portugal's Northern Regional Health Administration and used a convenience sample of 61 primary-care and 50 hospital-care physicians.

resultsResponse rate was 64% (49% to retest) for primary-care physicians and 66% (60% to retest) for hospital-care physicians. Content validity resulted in 9 changes to professional concepts. Face validity assessment resulted in 19 changes to linguistic and interpretative terms. In the case of the reliability analysis, the ICC values indicated a minimum of fair to good reproducibility (ICC > 0.4), and the Cronbach alpha values were satisfactory (α > 0.70).

conclusionsThe questionnaire developed is valid--in terms of face validity, content validity and reliability--for assessing physicians' attitudes to and knowledge of antibiotic prescribing and resistance, in both hospital and primary-care settings, and could be a very useful tool for characterising physicians' antibiotic-prescribing behaviour.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysiciansPrescriptionsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansPortugalReproducibility of ResultsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26746228
PMCPMC4705586
OpenAlexW2226324472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.