ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage2016
Influences on the decision to use an osteoarthritis diagnosis in primary care: a cohort study with linked survey and electronic health record data.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a model consultation informed by guidelines on recorded quality of care of osteoarthritis (MOSAICS): a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.Osteoarthritis and cartilage · 2017Trial
- Patients' Perspectives on Participation in an Effectiveness Study on Footwear Modification for the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Qualitative Study.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
- National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Classification approaches used to grade radiographic patellofemoral osteoarthritis: A scoping review.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
- Patterns of knee osteoarthritis management in general practice: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Incidence and Prevalence of Knee Osteoarthritis Using Codified and Narrative Data From Electronic Health Records: A Population-Based Study.Arthritis care & research · 2022Article
- Quantifying the population burden of musculoskeletal disorders, including impact on sickness absence: analysis of national Scottish data.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2022Article
- Article
- Early-stage symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee - time for action.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021Review
- Study protocol for an observational register-based study on health and risk factors in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Uptake of the NICE osteoarthritis guidelines in primary care: a survey of older adults with joint pain.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
- Underrecording of osteoarthritis in United Kingdom primary care electronic health record data.Clinical epidemiology · 2018Article
- Development of the "Treatment beliefs in knee and hip OsteoArthritis (TOA)" questionnaire.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveClinicians may record patients presenting with osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms with joint pain rather than an OA diagnosis. This may have implications for OA research studies and patient care. The objective was to assess whether older adults recorded with joint pain are similar to those with a recorded OA diagnosis.
methodA study of adults aged ≥50 years in eight United Kingdom general practices, with electronic health records linked to survey data. Patients with a recorded regional OA diagnosis were compared to those with a recorded joint pain symptom on socio-demographics, risk factors, body region, pain severity, prescribed analgesia, and potential differential diagnoses. A sub-group was compared on radiographic knee OA.
resultsThirteen thousand eight hundred and thirty-one survey responders consented to record review. One thousand four hundred and twenty-seven (10%) received an OA (n = 616) or joint pain (n = 811) code with wide practice variation. Receiving an OA diagnosis was associated with age (75+ compared to 50-64 OR 3.25; 95% Credible intervals (CrI) 2.36, 4.53), obesity (1.72; 1.22, 2.33), and pain interference (1.45; 1.09, 1.92). Analgesia management was similar. Radiographic OA was common in both groups. A quarter of those with a joint pain record received an OA diagnosis in the following 6 years.
conclusionRecording OA diagnoses are less common than recording a joint pain symptom and associated with risk factors and severity. OA studies in primary care need to consider joint pain symptoms to understand the burden and quality of care across the spectrum of OA. Patients recorded with joint pain may represent early cases of OA with need for early intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.