ArticlePloS one2016
Accuracy in HIV Rapid Testing among Laboratory and Non-laboratory Personnel in Zambia: Observations from the National HIV Proficiency Testing System.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Facilitators and barriers for HIV-testing in Zambia: A systematic review of multi-level factors.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- To err is human, to correct is public health: a systematic review examining poor quality testing and misdiagnosis of HIV status.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017Pooled it
- Misdiagnosis of HIV infection during a South African community-based survey: implications for rapid HIV testing.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017Trial
- Brief Report: Impact of Early Antiretroviral Therapy on the Performance of HIV Rapid Tests and HIV Incidence Assays.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2017Trial
- Assessing the Effectiveness of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Point-of-Care Proficiency Testing Scheme: Analysis of the Data From 2021 to 2022 in South Africa.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Factors associated with accuracy of rapid HIV test performance in the Eastern Cape, South Africa.Southern African journal of HIV medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Improving the quality of HIV rapid testing in Ghana using the dried tube specimen-based proficiency testing program.PloS one · 2022Article
- Investigating the quality of HIV rapid testing practices in public antenatal health care facilities, South Africa.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Stability testing of dried Plasmodium falciparum positive quality control samples for malaria rapid diagnostic tests in Liberia and Benin.Malaria journal · 2020Article
- Does antiretroviral therapy use affect the accuracy of HIV rapid diagnostic assays? Experience from a demographic health and surveillance site in rural South Africa.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2020Article
- Continuous quality monitoring in the field: an evaluation of the performance of the Fio Deki Reader™ for rapid HIV testing in South Africa.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Toward Improving Accessibility of Point-of-Care Diagnostic Services for Maternal and Child Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Point of care · 2019Article
- Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Integrating home HIV counselling and testing into household TB contact investigation: a mixed-methods study.Public health action · 2018Article
- False-positive HIV diagnoses: lessons from Ugandan and Russian research cohorts.HIV clinical trials · 2018Article
- External quality assessment for HIV rapid tests: challenges and opportunities in Haiti.BMJ global health · 2018Article
- Essential aspects of external quality assurance for point-of-care testing.Biochemia medica · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite rapid task-shifting and scale-up of HIV testing services in high HIV prevalence countries, studies evaluating accuracy remain limited. This study aimed to assess overall accuracy level and factors associated with accuracy in HIV rapid testing in Zambia.
methodsAccuracy was investigated among rural and urban HIV testing sites participating in two annual national HIV proficiency testing (PT) exercises conducted in 2009 (n = 282 sites) and 2010 (n = 488 sites). Testers included lay counselors, nurses, laboratory personnel and others. PT panels of five dry tube specimens (DTS) were issued to testing sites by the national reference laboratory (NRL). Site accuracy level was assessed by comparison of reported results to the expected results. Non-parametric rank tests and multiple linear regression models were used to assess variation in accuracy between PT cycles and between tester groups, and to examine factors associated with accuracy respectively.
resultsOverall accuracy level was 93.1% (95% CI: 91.2-94.9) in 2009 and 96.9% (95% CI: 96.1-97.8) in 2010. Differences in accuracy were seen between the tester groups in 2009 with laboratory personnel being more accurate than non-laboratory personnel, while in 2010 no differences were seen. In both PT exercises, lay counselors and nurses had more difficulties interpreting results, with more occurrences of false-negative, false-positive and indeterminate results. Having received the standard HIV rapid testing training and adherence to the national HIV testing algorithm were positively associated with accuracy.
conclusionThe study showed an improvement in tester group and overall accuracy from the first PT exercise to the next. Average number of incorrect test results per 1000 tests performed was reduced from 69 to 31. Further improvement is needed, however, and the national HIV proficiency testing system seems to be an important tool in this regard, which should be continued and needs to be urgently strengthened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.