Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26745247›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Trunk stabilization during sagittal pelvic tilt: from trunk-on-pelvis to trunk-in-space due to vestibular and visual feedback.

Paul van Drunen, Frans C T van der Helm, Jaap H van Dieën, Riender Happee

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Control of human gait stability through foot placement.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul van DrunenBiomechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Material Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands; and.
Frans C T van der HelmBiomechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Material Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands; and.
Jaap H van DieënMOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Riender HappeeBiomechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Material Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands; and R.Happee@tudelft.nl.
Delft University of Technology · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the human ability to stabilize the trunk in space during pelvic tilt. Upper body sway was evoked in kneeling-seated healthy subjects by angular platform perturbations with a rotation around a virtual low-back pivot point between the L4 and L5 vertebrae. To investigate motor control modulation, variations in task instruction (balance naturally or minimize trunk sway), vision (eyes open or closed), and perturbation bandwidth (from 0.2 up to 1, 3, or 10 Hz) were applied. Cocontraction and proprioceptive muscle spindle feedback were associated with minimizing low-back flexion/extension (trunk-on-pelvis stabilization), while vestibular and visual feedback were supposed to contribute to trunk-in-space stabilization. Trunk-in-space stabilization was only observed with the minimize trunk sway task instruction, while the task instruction to balance naturally led to trunk-on-pelvis stabilization with trunk rotations even exceeding the perturbations. This indicates that vestibular feedback is used when minimizing trunk sway but has only a minor contribution during natural trunk stabilization in the sagittal plane. The eyes open condition resulted in reduced global trunk rotations and increased global trunk reflexive responses, demonstrating effective visual contributions to trunk-in-space stabilization. On the other hand, increasing perturbation bandwidth caused a decreased feedback contribution leading to deteriorated trunk-in-space stabilization.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPelvisPostural BalanceVestibule, Labyrinthlumbar spinemuscle spindlespostural controlsystem identificationvisual and vestibular feedback

Identifiers

PMID26745247
PMCPMC4808127
OpenAlexW2211521056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.