Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26745246›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Repetition suppression for visual actions in the macaque superior temporal sulcus.

Pradeep Kuravi, Vittorio Caggiano, Martin Giese, Rufin Vogels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Adaptation aftereffects reveal representations for encoding of contingent social actions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  4. Visual adaptation enhances action sound discrimination.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pradeep KuraviLaboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium;
Vittorio CaggianoMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and.
Martin GieseSection on Computational Sensomotorics, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Werner-Reichardt Center for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN), University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Rufin VogelsLaboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; rufin.vogels@med.kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many brain areas, repetition of a stimulus usually weakens the neural response. This "adaptation" or repetition suppression effect has been observed with mass potential measures such as event-related potentials (ERPs), in fMRI BOLD responses, and locally with local field potentials (LFPs) and spiking activity. Recently, it has been reported that macaque F5 mirror neurons do not show repetition suppression of their spiking activity for single repetitions of hand actions, which disagrees with human fMRI adaptation studies. This finding also contrasts with numerous studies showing repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex, including the rostral superior temporal sulcus (STS). Since the latter studies employed static stimuli, we assessed here whether the use of dynamic action stimuli abolishes repetition suppression in the awake macaque STS. To assess adaptation effects in the STS, we employed the same hand action movies as used when examining adaptation in F5. The upper bank STS neurons showed repetition suppression during the approaching phase of the hand action, which corresponded to the phase of the action for which these neurons responded overall the strongest. The repetition suppression was present for the spiking activity measured in independent single-unit and multiunit recordings as well as for the LFP power at frequencies > 50 Hz. Together with previous data in F5, these findings suggest that adaptation effects differ between F5 mirror neurons and the STS neurons.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceRepetition PrimingVisual PerceptionAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEvoked PotentialsFemaleHandMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsTemporal Lobeadaptationhand action stimuliinferior temporal cortexmultiunit activitysingle-unit activity

Identifiers

PMID26745246
PMCPMC4808139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.